Pac vs Hearns, SRl and Hagler!!!!

**Shattered Jaw** · 11-15-2009, 12:26 PM

Against Hearns he would be KTFO. Against Leonard he would have more of a chance.

Ummm... I actually think he has the most chance against Hagler.

**Fulcrum29** · 11-15-2009, 12:26 PM

Originally posted by SpArKeD-CoLd

Do ya tink Pac would'a beat any od teese guys, to be harnest i dont tink he'd beat any od em....

I tink hes a great little srapper, but compared to the great Welterweights fighters of the 80z, i dont tink he'd be that magnificent

wud'ya tink guys.....

I just tink theres not tat many great fighters about teese days...

And pacquiao is a great fighter in amongst a bunch tartz who cant hack it... or havent got the skills to handle it

People get excited coz its d first bit od greatness dey ever seen.... But in d 80z, pac would'nt have been soo great...

tank ya very much guyz

Well there's one thing Pac wouldn't be able to beat, he'd never beat your magnificent ability to speak and write like a down syndrome ******.

**Fulcrum29** · 11-15-2009, 12:27 PM

Hearns would do the Duran on Pac. Out in 2 rounds.

**Stoppage** · 11-15-2009, 12:28 PM

Boxers from the early 1900's would probably lose against the guys today. Does that mean the boxers today are automatically greater than them?

Hearns, Leonard and Hagler would all beat Pacquiao badly. I don't know why you mentioned Hagler, though. He was a middleweight.

**Rorschach�** · 11-15-2009, 12:28 PM

no. just no.

**Bushbaby** · 11-15-2009, 12:28 PM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

Against Hearns he would be KTFO. Against Leonard he would have more of a chance.

Ummm... I actually think he has the most chance against Hagler.

Surely u don't mean the middleweight champ Hagler??The Hagler who is stronger than them all Hagler right??

**Fulcrum29** · 11-15-2009, 12:30 PM

your ******ed poll doesn't allow the option that they all beat Pac.

**SpArKeD-CoLd** · 11-15-2009, 12:33 PM

Originally posted by Stoppage

Boxers from the early 1900's would probably lose against the guys today. Does that mean the boxers today are automatically greater than them?

Hearns, Leonard and Hagler would all beat Pacquiao badly. I don't know why you mentioned Hagler, though. He was a middleweight.

It was "all 4 all" back in those days though, they used to jump around the weight classes, it was the WWs fighting the Middleweights.... etc

I'm only 21, ive only seen clips of the great fighters on youtube, but all i know is i think they'd all EXCEPT duran maybe.. beat pac

**SpArKeD-CoLd** · 11-15-2009, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by Fulcrum29

your ******ed poll doesn't allow the option that they all beat Pac.

Yea i know mate, bit of a **** ey!!!!

thats what i intended to do..... make it a multiple choice aption

Pac vs Hearns, SRl and Hagler!!!!