Pacquiao should get fighter of the decade now for sure.

[sycomantz]

nope. you ALL are wrong and im right. bwhahaha

[go1nbanana]

i wasnt talking to you fool and i agree. as of now. Pac is first in line for fighter of the decade...for now. May and Pacs fight will cement Floyd as fighter of the Decade and true P4P king

but i was talking to the dumbasses who cant count and thinks the decade ends on dec 31 2009 not dec 31 2010

we still have another year before the decade ends

your owned. accept it.

[manok uli]

I cant believe the level of ******edness of this guy.... SERIOUSLY... ****.

[Killa_Kali]

sig check

[sycomantz]

im right, like always haha.

[sweetpea87]

This is sig worthy.

I bet that post ends up in multiple sigs. That is maybe the dumbest post I have ever seen in here.

[manok uli]

He really was serious at the beginning... I think he realized it now... There is hope after all.

[Allucard]

I am a fan of Pacquiao even though I'm not a hardcore worshipper like some people are. And up until the Cotto victory, I actually thought that Bernard Hopkins had just as good of a case for it with wins over Wright, Pavlik, Tarver, Trinidad, a more prime De La Hoya than Pacquiao fought, and being so consistent past 40. I never even thought Mayweather belonged in this discussion and I would give the award to Hopkins or Pacquiao before him because of the way Floyd cherry picked his opponents. The reason why I gave this as a slight edge to Bernard is because I didn't think all that highly of Pacquiao's wins over De La Hoya, Hatton, and David Diaz. I thought the victory over JMM was good even if the fight was close. But Pacquiao's win over Cotto would make me give him the award for sure now, no questions asked.

Nope. There is a 40-0 contender still in for that prize. Don't try to ignore him. Manny knows he needs Floyd for that prize.

The winner is definitely the best of the decade. Bernard is nowhere near any of them.

[sycomantz]

He really was serious at the beginning... I think he realized it now... There is hope after all.

nope, im right...bwhahaha

[mathed]

I am a fan of Pacquiao even though I'm not a hardcore worshipper like some people are. And up until the Cotto victory, I actually thought that Bernard Hopkins had just as good of a case for it with wins over Wright, Pavlik, Tarver, Trinidad, a more prime De La Hoya than Pacquiao fought, and being so consistent past 40. I never even thought Mayweather belonged in this discussion and I would give the award to Hopkins or Pacquiao before him because of the way Floyd cherry picked his opponents. The reason why I gave this as a slight edge to Bernard is because I didn't think all that highly of Pacquiao's wins over De La Hoya, Hatton, and David Diaz. I thought the victory over JMM was good even if the fight was close. But Pacquiao's win over Cotto would make me give him the award for sure now, no questions asked.

He is BY FAR the best fighter I have ever seen!!!!!!!!!!