Pacquiao should get fighter of the decade now for sure.

[JulVal]

2011 is the start of the new decade. jan 1 2000- dec 31 2010 is one decade.

Floyd is fighter of the decde b/c hes going to stomp pac

****ing idiot. you never learn do you? lol

[hugh grant]

Thats a wrong statement to make, Yes Pac is the fighter of the decade or there about but if you use that logic with Mayweather opponent then where are guys that Pac fought today also??? Another thing is Mayweather fought at the top long before Pac came on the scene so its obvious that most of Mayweather opponents are either retired due to old age or shot to piece and just trying to make a living by fighting young up and comers.

Not really. Barrera and Morales are ATG because of what they achieved and were top 5 p4p for a time as well. PBFs earlier opponents were unknowns, not top 10 p4p and certainly not ATG.

Another thing Pac ended careers with the one sided beatings he gave people. After being in a fight with PBF on the other hand, his opponents didnt even feel as if they had been in a fight, so PBF wasnt a career ender. DLH after fighting PBF felt like he was superman and then thought he could beat Pac.

What about the tale end of PBFs career. Where is baldomir etc of this world. If Baldomir was still fighting and kicking butt we could say that was a good opponent for him. But the fact he lost 8 before fighting PBF, it is unlikely we would credit PBF.

[Left Hook Tua]

Is January 1, 2010, part of the current decade or a new one?

Because if it does, then Floyd can still 'steal' this award by beating Manny.

the decade ends december 31 , 2009.

2000-2009.

2010-2019 is the next decade.

[Ray*]

Not really. Barrera and Morales are ATG because of what they achieved and were top 5 p4p for a time as well. PBFs earlier opponents were unknowns, not top 10 p4p and certainly not ATG.

What about the tale end of PBFs career. Where is baldomir etc of this world.

Corrales is known and a great fighter in his own right who fought Mayweather when he was undefeated and highly favoured, Castillo the same, Morales and Barrera are great fighter who had been involve in wars before they fought pac.

If you telling me Mayweather's previous or earlier opponents are unknown then you need to study up on boxing, And Baldomir is in his late 30's and almost retired which is one of my original point.

Its easy to make anyone's resume look ordinary, Even pac has is own "Baldomir" or worse on his resume but am not here to do that.

[salsalero]

7 titles in 7 weight divisions
4 lineal titles
fought at lightweight, welterweight, jr welter within a year.

Who else????

[hugh grant]

Corrales is known and a great fighter in his own right who fought Mayweather when he was undefeated and highly favoured, Castillo the same, Morales and Barrera are great fighter who had been involve in wars before they fought pac.

Its easy to make anyone's resume look ordinary, Even pac has is own "Baldomir" or worse on his resume but am not here to do that.

All im saying it is hard to gauge how good PBFs opponents were and just how much credit he deserves for those wins because we dont know how well they would be if they were here now. The fact that none of them are here like PBF suggests they are Jeff lacys.

Whatever you say, PBFs opponents, are not on the Barreras, and Morales level. You can talk about how Morales and Barrera were over the hill as much as you want, so we dont know how much credit Pac should get for those wins as much as you want.
But Pac has in some way justified his credit for those fights proving they are no fluke by beating the Cottos, DLH and Hattons of this world.

Its hard to gauge not only how much credit PBF should be getting for his earlier career, but also his present career, because he dont challenged himself. Hasnt given me a reason to defend him.

[gopi11]

no its not. jan 1 2011 is 11 years

A typical Floyd stan that knows nothing but to suck Floyd's ****! LMAO!!!
Year 2000 to 2009 is 10 years and it's called a decade, idiot!

[aether]

2000 to 2009 is 9 years your dumbass.

2000 through 2010 is 10 years...idiots haha

[cherokee]

this **** is hilarousl hahahah

worthy of a big time BUMP!

and will bump it again on 1st January 2010

just to remind the dumbass the start of a new decade hahaha

[Amazinger]

a decade is a period of 10 years.

2000 to 2009 is 9 years...what dont you understand?

This guy is the most ****** of all the ****** poster on this site.
I'll bet or hope he's only punched drunk,Or else we're doomed. Coz we are communicating with a slug.


HEY!!! IDIOT OF THE DECADE that should be your new name.