I still don't think Pac will Beat Mayweather at all!

[-EX-]

He was putting the pressure on in all 3 fights being more offensive because that's how he fights southpaws.

All 3 clipped him more than he usually gets hit, even Mitchell. He just had a good enough chin to not be affected by em.

Well Zab was throwing nothing back so, I mean...lol

The Corley fight was just a brawl...he fought offensive from the opening bell and showed Corley no respect(and paid for it)

Haven't seen the Mitchell fight in a while...

A Pacquiao fight will be very different from these fights IMO...

Floyd doesn't fight the same, is bigger, and Pacquiao is better than all 3 of those guys...

And even if Floyd is offensive, it doesn't mean he'll go to war with Pac...

[Silky-Flow]

Haven't seen him fight a southpaw yet where he didn't eventually resort to putting pressure and opening up offensively.

Naive of you to already predict what strategy he'll use. I sure would like to see what he tries because I see a few problems showing up against Pac.

What about Manny against counter punchers i.e Marquez? you talk about Floyd getting "clipped" a few times against southpaws but he never had anywhere near the same kind of problems that Manny had wth Marquez, at least Floyd adapted, i don't think the same can be said about Manny in the two fights against JMM.

[jamesbrown]

Haven't seen him fight a southpaw yet where he didn't eventually resort to putting pressure and opening up offensively.

Naive of you to already predict what strategy he'll use. I sure would like to see what he tries because I see a few problems showing up against Pac.

its naive to predict the future which is unknown... i also predict a lot less shoulder roll than one might think.. and lot of little shouldering for balance advantages things pacman never does. I see possible problems without question but will they lead to knockdowns and loss of enough rounds to lose the fight.... i don't think so what about u?

[dde91]

What about Manny against counter punchers i.e Marquez? you talk about Floyd getting "clipped" a few times against southpaws but he never had anywhere near the same kind of problems that Manny had wth Marquez, at least Floyd adapted, i don't think the same can be said about Manny in the two fights against JMM.

And i could say the same about Floyd adapting in Corrales 1?? lol we all know floyd lost the first fight so i dont know why you bring up JMM like Floyd never had trouble with a fighter.

i think because he fought Marquez at Marquez's best weight class, plus Pacquiao has IMPROVED so much since his fight with Marquez. If you cant see that then you must be blind. I think if Manny fought Marquez at 140 in 3 months, Manny will Knock him out cold or dominate him because Manny is now a all around fighter.

But every fighter in history always had a tough fighter that when you talk about their career you will talk about the others.
Look at Ali and Norton. Ali always had trouble with Norton but Norton got rocked by Frazier. Ali beat Frazier 2 outta 3. Does that mean Ali isn't as good because Frazier beat him more decisively?

Manny Pacquiao had trouble with Juan Manuel Marquez in the lower weight classes. The first fight he clearly won even tho Marquez fought his way back into the fight. The DRAW was a bull**** decision.
Then in the second fight, Marquez got knocked down which made the difference in the fight. Pacquiao won that fight too and since then Pacquiao has gotten better and better. Now he put EVERYTHING together and is still in his prime.

[iBox]

I got Pac beating Mayweather, just because he's a southpaw and can keep it up for 12 rounds (unlike Judah), although i don't believe Mayweather can get any better devensively, than he was vs Marquez.