Some boxing expert!!!! are they really experts!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zalez787
    Banned
    • Aug 2009
    • 509
    • 28
    • 8
    • 635

    #11
    Originally posted by bojangles1987
    Because Pac was a lightweight that moved up to welterweight for that fight and he was expected to get KTFO. He brutally beat the hell out of De La Hoya when most did not expect it.
    He was expected to get ktfo??? by who , by you???? or by those "experts" , cuz whoever it was , they had been smoking crack to think that De la Hoya was even going to land anything significant on Pacquiao , u and I both know that , if u didnt , u shouldnt be in this forum

    Comment

    • zalez787
      Banned
      • Aug 2009
      • 509
      • 28
      • 8
      • 635

      #12
      Originally posted by tehMatrix
      yep....pacquaio nuthugger, that's me.....
      When u have something smarter to say , please come back , I love an intellectual debate , If u dont agree that Pac's win over De la Hoya is overlooked then ur an idiot. really How long has it been since De la Hoya was near the top of the sport. Hes a legend , but that doesnt mean he had a chance. moron

      Comment

      • Ray*
        Be safe!!!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 44867
        • 1,654
        • 1,608
        • 558,890

        #13
        Pac came from the lower weights, At the end of the day all people see is a smaller guy fighting a much more bigger guy on paper, They dont know all the meet me in the middle stuffs like catchweight.

        Comment

        • zalez787
          Banned
          • Aug 2009
          • 509
          • 28
          • 8
          • 635

          #14
          Originally posted by Stewie Cruise
          Pac came from the lower weights, At the end of the day all people see is a smaller guy fighting a much more bigger guy on paper, They dont know all the meet me in the middle stuffs like catchweight.
          Yeah I know but common man , De La hoya didnt stand a chance , thats my argument here , yes pac came from a smaller weight class , but against De la Hoya??? Roach would have not let that fight happen , Even after De la Hoya lost his second fight to Moley , It was timed perfectly , I always said it. Too bad I wasnt a member or I would have been refering back to anything I would have posted about that fight , Cuz since it was announced , I was looking to bet on Pac , Nobody wanted to bet more than 50 bucks with me , NOBODY.And I said it , I mean , he gets credit , He beat him more than convincingly but Common , At this point , DE la Hoya was trying to get his last paycheck.

          Comment

          • WhoreUs
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 15770
            • 556
            • 606
            • 20,363

            #15
            Doesn't matter that DLH was past prime.
            Pac was supposed to get iced by DLH.
            The big hype is on the smaller man playing David vs Goliath in that fight.
            And Cotto edged Shane.
            He didn't own him as some would like to believe.
            And "experts" are just fans too.
            They are people who watch fights, not actually fighters.
            Their opinions aren't the source of all sources just because.
            And who cares about those past fights?
            Cotto isn't DLH.
            And Pac isn't Shane.
            It's a whole new fight.

            Comment

            • carlos djackal
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 178
              • 4
              • 0
              • 6,513

              #16
              I am puzzled myself, even by comparing Pacs last five fights to Miguel, Pac's opponents pale in comparison, I think it's because the media is riding on the Pacman hype, puzzles me even more why these "experts" could not to see the difference.........

              Comment

              • zalez787
                Banned
                • Aug 2009
                • 509
                • 28
                • 8
                • 635

                #17
                Originally posted by WhoreUs
                Doesn't matter that DLH was past prime.
                Pac was supposed to get iced by DLH.
                The big hype is on the smaller man playing David vs Goliath in that fight.
                And Cotto edged Shane.
                He didn't own him as some would like to believe.
                And "experts" are just fans too.
                They are people who watch fights, not actually fighters.
                Their opinions aren't the source of all sources just because.
                And who cares about those past fights?
                Cotto isn't DLH.
                And Pac isn't Shane.
                It's a whole new fight.
                Who ever thought De la Hoya had a chance was an idiot. He was not supposed to get iced , I mean anyone who thought that shouldnt be watching boxing. Pacquiao was the underdog in paper , and only to idiots. Let me ask u something , who did u have winning that fight?? who did u think was going to win.

                Comment

                • zalez787
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 509
                  • 28
                  • 8
                  • 635

                  #18
                  Originally posted by carlos djackal
                  I am puzzled myself, even by comparing Pacs last five fights to Miguel, Pac's opponents pale in comparison, I think it's because the media is riding on the Pacman hype, puzzles me even more why these "experts" could not to see the difference.........
                  Thank you god for this smart comment.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP