He was expected to get ktfo??? by who , by you???? or by those "experts" , cuz whoever it was , they had been smoking crack to think that De la Hoya was even going to land anything significant on Pacquiao , u and I both know that , if u didnt , u shouldnt be in this forum
Some boxing expert!!!! are they really experts!!!
Collapse
-
When u have something smarter to say , please come back , I love an intellectual debate , If u dont agree that Pac's win over De la Hoya is overlooked then ur an idiot. really How long has it been since De la Hoya was near the top of the sport. Hes a legend , but that doesnt mean he had a chance. moronComment
-
Yeah I know but common man , De La hoya didnt stand a chance , thats my argument here , yes pac came from a smaller weight class , but against De la Hoya??? Roach would have not let that fight happen , Even after De la Hoya lost his second fight to Moley , It was timed perfectly , I always said it. Too bad I wasnt a member or I would have been refering back to anything I would have posted about that fight , Cuz since it was announced , I was looking to bet on Pac , Nobody wanted to bet more than 50 bucks with me , NOBODY.And I said it , I mean , he gets credit , He beat him more than convincingly but Common , At this point , DE la Hoya was trying to get his last paycheck.Comment
-
Doesn't matter that DLH was past prime.
Pac was supposed to get iced by DLH.
The big hype is on the smaller man playing David vs Goliath in that fight.
And Cotto edged Shane.
He didn't own him as some would like to believe.
And "experts" are just fans too.
They are people who watch fights, not actually fighters.
Their opinions aren't the source of all sources just because.
And who cares about those past fights?
Cotto isn't DLH.
And Pac isn't Shane.
It's a whole new fight.
Comment
-
I am puzzled myself, even by comparing Pacs last five fights to Miguel, Pac's opponents pale in comparison, I think it's because the media is riding on the Pacman hype, puzzles me even more why these "experts" could not to see the difference.........Comment
-
Who ever thought De la Hoya had a chance was an idiot. He was not supposed to get iced , I mean anyone who thought that shouldnt be watching boxing. Pacquiao was the underdog in paper , and only to idiots. Let me ask u something , who did u have winning that fight?? who did u think was going to win.Doesn't matter that DLH was past prime.
Pac was supposed to get iced by DLH.
The big hype is on the smaller man playing David vs Goliath in that fight.
And Cotto edged Shane.
He didn't own him as some would like to believe.
And "experts" are just fans too.
They are people who watch fights, not actually fighters.
Their opinions aren't the source of all sources just because.
And who cares about those past fights?
Cotto isn't DLH.
And Pac isn't Shane.
It's a whole new fight.
Comment
-
Thank you god for this smart comment.Comment

Comment