One question , Whats up with these boxing experts giving Pacquiao so much credit for beating De la Hoya and at the same time , Overlooking that Mosley- which beat De la Hoya twice , when he actually still had something left , got beat by Cotto , in a more competitive fight.
I mean I dont know about you , but to me at this point a win over Mosley , deserves more credit , than a win over De la Hoya. After all Moley jut beat a pretty good fighter/cheater. Which plaster or not , was pretty good himself.
This is almost like a triangle theory. But is not , is like a quadrilateral theory about who deserves more credit. And why , If imo one fighter deserves more credit , is the other one getting all the hype. Does it seem fair to me. This is not a hate thread because I am a fan of Manny , but it doesnt seem fair to me.
I mean I dont know about you , but to me at this point a win over Mosley , deserves more credit , than a win over De la Hoya. After all Moley jut beat a pretty good fighter/cheater. Which plaster or not , was pretty good himself.
This is almost like a triangle theory. But is not , is like a quadrilateral theory about who deserves more credit. And why , If imo one fighter deserves more credit , is the other one getting all the hype. Does it seem fair to me. This is not a hate thread because I am a fan of Manny , but it doesnt seem fair to me.
Comment