Some boxing expert!!!! are they really experts!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zalez787
    Banned
    • Aug 2009
    • 509
    • 28
    • 8
    • 635

    #1

    Some boxing expert!!!! are they really experts!!!

    One question , Whats up with these boxing experts giving Pacquiao so much credit for beating De la Hoya and at the same time , Overlooking that Mosley- which beat De la Hoya twice , when he actually still had something left , got beat by Cotto , in a more competitive fight.

    I mean I dont know about you , but to me at this point a win over Mosley , deserves more credit , than a win over De la Hoya. After all Moley jut beat a pretty good fighter/cheater. Which plaster or not , was pretty good himself.

    This is almost like a triangle theory. But is not , is like a quadrilateral theory about who deserves more credit. And why , If imo one fighter deserves more credit , is the other one getting all the hype. Does it seem fair to me. This is not a hate thread because I am a fan of Manny , but it doesnt seem fair to me.
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #2
    they're about as legit as us, only they get paid for it

    Comment

    • zalez787
      Banned
      • Aug 2009
      • 509
      • 28
      • 8
      • 635

      #3
      Originally posted by tehMatrix
      they're about as geniune as us, only they get paid for it
      You prob a Pacquiao nuthugger , who got insulted , but what I said is completely true. Pacquiao - De la Hoya was so pointless , Why didnt he fight somebody else at ww , Margarito , Clottey , NOOOO!!! he had to fight , DE LA OLDIE. STFU man , u know what im saying and ur too scared to admit it.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #4
        Teddy Atlas is really no "expert" - he's been around the sport for a long time but he's a moron.

        Comment

        • SplitSecond
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 23151
          • 1,715
          • 1,187
          • 85,044

          #5
          Originally posted by zalez787
          You prob a Pacquiao nuthugger , who got insulted , but what I said is completely true. Pacquiao - De la Hoya was so pointless , Why didnt he fight somebody else at ww , Margarito , Clottey , NOOOO!!! he had to fight , DE LA OLDIE. STFU man , u know what im saying and ur too scared to admit it.
          yep....pacquaio nuthugger, that's me.....

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #6
            Because Pac was a lightweight that moved up to welterweight for that fight and he was expected to get KTFO. He brutally beat the hell out of De La Hoya when most did not expect it.

            Comment

            • h2k
              Interim Champion
              • May 2008
              • 988
              • 40
              • 22
              • 9,805

              #7
              Originally posted by zalez787
              You prob a Pacquiao nuthugger , who got insulted , but what I said is completely true. Pacquiao - De la Hoya was so pointless , Why didnt he fight somebody else at ww , Margarito , Clottey , NOOOO!!! he had to fight , DE LA OLDIE. STFU man , u know what im saying and ur too scared to admit it.
              I think youre the one of the people who said this fight is a circus a complete mismatch, and now you're singing a different tune because you don't want to give pacquiao a credit he deserve.

              Comment

              • Bobby_Manila
                Contender
                • Nov 2009
                • 233
                • 9
                • 9
                • 6,298

                #8
                Originally posted by zalez787
                One question , Whats up with these boxing experts giving Pacquiao so much credit for beating De la Hoya and at the same time , Overlooking that Mosley- which beat De la Hoya twice , when he actually still had something left , got beat by Cotto , in a more competitive fight.

                I mean I dont know about you , but to me at this point a win over Mosley , deserves more credit , than a win over De la Hoya. After all Moley jut beat a pretty good fighter/cheater. Which plaster or not , was pretty good himself.

                This is almost like a triangle theory. But is not , is like a quadrilateral theory about who deserves more credit. And why , If imo one fighter deserves more credit , is the other one getting all the hype. Does it seem fair to me. This is not a hate thread because I am a fan of Manny , but it doesnt seem fair to me.
                They are caught up in the hype. They always are.

                Dan Rafael talking about weight = Self ownage.

                Comment

                • zalez787
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 509
                  • 28
                  • 8
                  • 635

                  #9
                  Originally posted by h2k
                  I think youre the one of the people who said this fight is a circus a complete mismatch, and now you're singing a different tune because you don't want to give pacquiao a credit he deserve.
                  Actually i was one of the ones that said De la Oldie was wayyyy to OLD to even think he can trade or catch Pacquiao , I actually made 50 bucks off some ****** moron that thought De la Oldie had a chance , does that answer ur question , how bout this , Answer this , If Mosley has been more active than De la Hoya , and Mosley would have definitely agreed to fight Pacquiao , why didnt they go after Mosley , Roach is way to smart to go up into the ww division and take on a real challenge so he called out a washed up legend with nothing to challenge his fighter. Pacquiao will get his credit after this fight , if he wins , If Cotto loses he will prob beat De la Hoya , De la Hoya cannot compete in 147 with the elite , And **** that **** Pacquiao is a small fighter , he is great , but a win over De la Oldie , shouldnt be overlooked like it is. He didnt have a chance

                  Comment

                  • SweetSci
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 272
                    • 79
                    • 0
                    • 34,472

                    #10
                    Even Burt Sugar, man

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP