Cotto is going to blow it against Pacquiao anyways, because unlike Margarito Pacquiao doesn't need plaster to stop Cottos ass.
WOW!Miguel Cotto cites photo in disputed match with Antonio Margarito
Collapse
-
-
You are not a Cotto fan dude you just another ******* trying to look unbias, I mean look at you ****ing bet with mellow. You ain't no Cotto fan fool. why the **** do you care if I call Margacheato out? why you getting so butthurt *****?Comment
-
Shut the **** up. I read all I had to read from the **** article.
All it has is new quotes from new people who were never there saying they have evidence from looking at old pictures that have been posted here multiple times by different posters. While Cotto and his team are saying the same **** again.
So get your head out of your ass.Comment
-
You just exposed yourself fool. You ain't no Cotto fan so stop trying to act like you are one.Comment
-
WTF is your problem? The article has new stuff and some posters treated like it was nothing. Jeez you *******s need to calm the **** down.I don't care you ****ing dumb ass you make us cotto fans look dumb as hell. You are the worst Cotto fan on this ****ing website, what are you like 12 or some ****?
I don't give a **** if they even have video tape of Margarito putting plaster into his wraps before the Cotto fight. All of us already know he cheated against Cotto, we don't need any god damn evidence for it because he already ruined his name against Mosley. That is enough for me to say that ***** ass coward probably cheated in a bunch of fights especially against Cotto. It's something called common ****ing sense.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The only new stuff I got from the article was:
Dean Lohuis, the former California inspector who pulled the hardened inserts from Margarito's wraps before the Mosley bout, said: "Those pads were used in more than one fight. . . . The pad was dirty, used and looked like it had been around several times before. I'm convinced it was there against Miguel [Cotto]. . . . You can say it's circumstantial but in my view . . . it was more likely than not."
Just an addition opinion.
The point is, majority of the article is pretty much old news. We've heard it all before.Comment
Comment