Roach Says Pacquiao Has To Start Fast in Round One
Collapse
-
-
lolz... now you are taking back you're statment... you said that mosley admitted that he lost, but now you've taken it back and said at best it was a draw.
like I said... give me the link where "I lost" came out of mosley's mouth!!!!
come on!!!! power punches are more effective than jabs and you know its clean because they counted it. controlling the pace is ring generalship and that is a distant 3rd or 4th criteria (and only used in absence of clean effective punching) next to clean effective punching which is the 1st criteria of scoring a round. if you look at the stats mosley was landing more and landing more accurately power punches. the only thing cotto beat mosley on was jabs.... if I had to take a hit from mosley's power punches or cotto's jabs, I'd take cotto's jab every ****in day!Also, Mosley did outland Cotto in power punches, but that doesn't take into consideration who landed the more effective, cleaner blows. Who was controlling the pace of the fight, and who was more accurate which was Cotto.
of course he can't! he's a ****in former 106 lber whlie cotto is an elite WWAnyway, the sheer fact that Roach is asking for a point after from one low blow has me thinking Manny still can't take a body shot.
obviously... cotto is too big for pac.Cotto is most definitely going to go to the body, and this is the only way Roach can do anything about stopping that.
cotto was too busy running from mosley and margo to work the bodyAlso, the only time Cotto's ever been deducted for a low blow was against Judah. Never had a problem with Shane, he was getting battered FAR FAR worse against Marg, no low blow. This alone really has me wondering how much confidence Roach really has in Manny and if his own hype and gone to his head.Comment
-
lolz... typical cotto stan... you filter out everything good I have to say about cotto and only hear the bad.Comment
-
Comment
-
Wow, you sir are a dumbass.
Mosley in that link, if you would actually look at because I know you still haven't says "I think he might won won by a couple points or it was a draw." I'll even admit I took back the fact that he said he lost, by saying it was draw. Either way your entire signature is shot to hell because the man IN THE ring admitted the other man won (Which means I lost) or best case scenario for you, it was a draw. You have no leg to stand on man, I'm done acknowledging the Cotto/Mosley fight except for whats in my sig until you change yours.Comment
-
No, because all you say in 99% of your posts, a whole bunch of bull**** followed by more of it. If you had something relevant to say I would acknowledge it as I do with every other poster on here.Comment
-
So you know Pac better than his trainer huh? You know whats up!! lmaoPacman doesnt need to start fast, but he has to fast for the full fight. I give Pacman the edge, but he needs to stick to an "in-and-out" strategie and he needs to be a good tactician. He needs to be the player and give the rythem. If Pacman tries to adapt to Cotto, he will certainly lose the fight. But Cotto is not Marquez, but he is somebody who can adapt very well.
But speed will be one major factor in the fight. More than power imo.
Comment
-
bwhahaah...Wow, you sir are a dumbass.
Mosley in that link, if you would actually look at because I know you still haven't says "I think he might won won by a couple points or it was a draw." I'll even admit I took back the fact that he said he lost, by saying it was draw. Either way your entire signature is shot to hell because the man IN THE ring admitted the other man won (Which means I lost) or best case scenario for you, it was a draw. You have no leg to stand on man, I'm done acknowledging the Cotto/Mosley fight except for whats in my sig until you change yours.
I don't have to click the link because I know which one you post and the words "I Lost" never came out of mosley's mouth...
listen to what I am saying:
SHOW ME THE LINK WHERE THE WORDS "I LOST" COMES OUT OF MOSLEY'S MOUTH!!!!!
trust me, you can't find one cause mosley never says it.
so the only time anyone says anything relevant about cotto is when they praise him???
you're a tool.Comment
-
I'm the tool and your answer to Mosley saying "I think he might have won by a couple of rounds or it was a draw" is "He didn't say he lost." And you still expect me or anyone else to take you seriously? Jesus, you're too ****** to know how dumb you are. I mean even ******s know they are ******ed.bwhahaah...
I don't have to click the link because I know which one you post and the words "I Lost" never came out of mosley's mouth...
listen to what I am saying:
SHOW ME THE LINK WHERE THE WORDS "I LOST" COMES OUT OF MOSLEY'S MOUTH!!!!!
trust me, you can't find one cause mosley never says it.
so the only time anyone says anything relevant about cotto is when they praise him???
you're a tool.Comment
-
Also, he keeps OR actually has it on his sig on how Cotto lost to Mosley, if you are a fan of Cotto so much why you try to constantly bash him?? That dude is ridiculous.1) How do you defend Cotto all the time, by saying he should retire and will be a shame for boxing if he loses to a former 106 lber when Cotto was actually a former 105lber?? And by the way will be facing the current P4P best in the sport. The same guy you have said has more boxing skills and and that Cotto won't able to deal with his speed!!! (Proof below)
2) Him and plenty of others have expose you already on this website where
you have lost your credibility, if you ever had one!!!Comment
Comment