If Cotto wins, is he PICKING ON SMALL FIGHTERS?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bhopreign
    Banned
    • Jun 2006
    • 11273
    • 419
    • 100
    • 12,036

    #81
    Originally posted by JAB5239
    Diaz was arguably winning the fight at the time of stoppage.

    Not sure where you're going here.
    Winning? Are you serious? Diaz landed nothing after round 3 and even rounds 1-3 could possibly have gone either way, what did Diaz land after round 3, nothing at all.

    Comment

    • Jiddu Dali
      Banned
      • Aug 2009
      • 2938
      • 88
      • 62
      • 3,196

      #82
      Originally posted by WhoreUs
      This is comical.
      When will these stans stop crying?
      After Saturday, your hero can fight the winner.
      Question is will he fight them?
      Will he fight any top guy in his actual weight class again?
      And lmao at "this isn't a diss to Cotto."
      Of course not.
      It's just an informal demand to not give him props if he wins.
      Once again Judy Dilly Dalli;
      Your hero doesn't know you exist.
      He wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.
      He doesn't give a fuck about you.
      Why are you obsessed with defending him?
      You're only embarrassing yourself.

      um actually..Cotto gets all the credit in the world...just like Mayweather should get credit for beating Marquez....

      Pac & Marquez are the same size...lol

      and damn man u used this last week "He wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire"

      Comment

      • syphillis
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 1281
        • 252
        • 291
        • 8,876

        #83
        Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
        um PAC FAN BOY!!!


        explain to me why the need for a catch weight?
        Okay. Floyd at 147, JMM at 135. Why the need for a catch-weight of 146?

        Comment

        • VERDUGO
          We are Warriors!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2005
          • 4746
          • 249
          • 415
          • 13,930

          #84
          Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
          um PAC FAN BOY!!!


          explain to me why the need for a catch weight?


          *****

          Comment

          • JAB5239
            Dallas Cowboys
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 27736
            • 5,036
            • 4,436
            • 73,018

            #85
            Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
            SO WHY DOES ARUM WANT TO FACE AN OLD FAT MARQUEZ AGAIN FOR PACQUIAO?????



            GTFOH!!
            First off its a fight most fans want so they can have a sense of closure on their epic battles. Second, as far as I know the fight isn't made yet. Third, at least Pac won't make Marquez come up to welter and than come in over the contracted weight.

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #86
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              If thats the case then they shouldn't be weightclasses. At the end of the day is not the weight is the skill. So all weightclasses shoud be gone. Boy, you are in the same league as Jiddu, Horus, Klitschko2009.
              So weight wins fights? Youre being extreme, you know Im not saying Calderon would beat a Klit. But if weight wins fights Im supposed to beat Calderon, Im sure I wouldnt. One criteria would only win a fight if a fighter cant adjust to it, good fighters adjust.

              Comment

              • VERDUGO
                We are Warriors!
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2005
                • 4746
                • 249
                • 415
                • 13,930

                #87
                Originally posted by syphillis
                Okay. Floyd at 147, JMM at 135. Why the need for a catch-weight of 146?
                Don't try explaining it tohim.
                He's a *****.

                Comment

                • S A M U R A I
                  Bulletproof
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 181694
                  • 1,495
                  • 1,324
                  • 1,419,318

                  #88
                  Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
                  this can be debated all day....who gives a ****...

                  Beating Oscar for a 154 title at his weight at that time > dropping Oscar to 146lbs to fight for no title

                  which one is more meaningful?

                  The fact that lil' Manny came up from a lower division to a weight that Oscar requested (147) and annihilated him within 8 rounds when 90% of the boxing world didn't give him a chance is more impressive than a guy who weighed in at 150 and earned a split decision, and that was a fight that many thought Oscar won.

                  Pacquiao's victory over Oscar is much moire impressive.

                  Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
                  Of course

                  so why do people want to see JMM-Pac 3?
                  Because they fought two close fights at lower weights and they have unfinished business. Manny was drained in the last fight, most likely contributing to his lackluster performance. If Marquez is foolish enough to get in the ring with a 140lb Pacquiao, that's his problem. He should know by now that he doesn't carry the weight, speed and power like Manny does. But if he wants it, I'll watch.

                  Regarding Mayweather-Marquez, Juan is not the same fighter at 144 as he is at 130. He has to drink a couple of dozen quayle eggs every day to get up that high. Marquez against Mayweather was a 130lb fighter all bloated up and sluggish. Sure, they came in at similar weights, but c'mon -- who's got the big advantage here, Marquez the 130lb fighter with 14 pounds of added fat or Floyd the natural Welterweight with 146lb of solid muscle?

                  I have no idea why anyone is trying to legitimize this "win". It's pretty desperate if you ask me.



                  100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
                  Last edited by S A M U R A I; 11-12-2009, 05:58 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Jiddu Dali
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 2938
                    • 88
                    • 62
                    • 3,196

                    #89
                    Originally posted by syphillis
                    If you really think that was an even fight and that JMM had a slight chance of beating Floyd, well good luck convincing otherwise... This was one of the many reasons I am no longer his fans.
                    So Pac has a chance of beating Mayweather?, but Marquez had no chance to beat mayweather? & Pac beat Marquez twice and he wants to fight him again?....

                    GTFOH!

                    Comment

                    • Bhopreign
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 11273
                      • 419
                      • 100
                      • 12,036

                      #90
                      Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
                      So Pac has a chance of beating Mayweather?, but Marquez had no chance to beat mayweather? & Pac beat Marquez twice and he wants to fight him again?....

                      GTFOH!
                      That doesnt make much sense does it, cant have it both ways.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP