Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?

[jedc28]

pbf nuthuggers: ALL HAIL MAYWEATHAAAA PRAISE THE KING

[Glamour Puss]

[QUOTE=Jiddu Dali;6588589]

of course not..thats not logical..but it is logical for people to give Mayweather credit for beating Marquez if they are going to give Pac credit and if they want to see Pac-Marquez 3 or even Pac-Mayweather...dont u think?

No, Pac and JMM fought at 26' and 30'.

Not at 47'. And they're both naturally smaller guys than Floyd.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

What exactly do you want me to type? you're belittling Castillo, Corrales and Genaro just to make Mayweather's resume look bad. I have no argument for you, just that you're dumb. I honestly have nothing for you man, sorry.

that's because you dont got squat. Im not belittling Genaro, Corrales, & Castillo.

All 3 are very good fighters but not atg true bona fide first ballot hall of famers.

Trust me Castillo & Gatti are not true hall of fame fighters. Corrales & Genaro are on the fringe.

I can make a thread in boxing history so we can get the real knowledgeable posters opinion.

[Kevin Jesus]

that's because you dont got squat. Im not belittling Genaro, Corrales, & Castillo.

All 3 are very good fighters but not atg true bona fide first ballot hall of famers.

Trust me Castillo & Gatti are not true hall of fame fighters. Corrales & Genaro are on the fringe.

I can make a thread in boxing history so we can get the real knowledgeable posters opinion.

I never once said they are, I have a problem with you calling them fringe.

[Jiddu Dali]

And this Saturday will only widen the gap even a loss to Cotto makes Pac look better because he is a LW who had the courage to move up and challenge himself while Floyd seems to have no interest in fighting opposition in his own weightclass.....much respect to Pac win, lose, or draw Saturday.

LMAO @ this!!

Um Mayweather was a LW before Pac was my friend...

try again

[MaD RoBoT]

[QUOTE=Jiddu Dali;6588589]

of course not..thats not logical..but it is logical for people to give Mayweather credit for beating Marquez if they are going to give Pac credit and if they want to see Pac-Marquez 3 or even Pac-Mayweather...dont u think?

WTF is wrong with your logic man

of course they'll gonna give more credit to Pac because he fought JMM IN HIS OWN DIVISION

Floyd fighting JMM AT WELTERWEIGHT is a travesty

[CrackYourJaw]

Who are you trying to convince?

Neither side is going to budge.

[mod]

Morales is Greater than those guys that Mayweather K.O.ed

[Chups]

OMG!! This is a self Ownage thread. Pac is winning again by landslide.


And sidekick Horus is trying to find the right question for Floyd. LOL!!


"So let me ask you this boxing fans, who had a better amateur career, Pac was a nobody in the amateurs."

LOL!!

[Jiddu Dali]

PAC
-- 4 lineal titles
-- 6 division titles
-- names : sasakul, ledwaba , mab , morales , jmm , dlh , hat

PBF
-- 3 lineal titles
-- 5 division titles
-- names : genaro , manfredy , coralles , castillo , hernandez , dlh , hat , jmm


PBF might have beaten more "NAMES" but PAC have the better fights , better legacy and fought most of them at their prime weights. Not to mention he managed most of the wins using just a jab-jab-straight left.

If you want to compare their 1st 25 fights , of course pbf would come out on top. Pac is still not fully developed then while Pbf already have major boxing experience in the amateurs. Do you want to compare their last 15 fights?

You are very picky in the number of years at P4P list. Pac was already knocking on Pbf's door even before he retired. IMO, Longetivity is just one part of the criteria for fighter of the decade. Body of work and level of opposition is another thing. And also in my opinion, Pbf's 2002 and above resume is highly questionable.

wow @ you writing 'sasakul, ledwaba "

and if you are going to compare resumes you must do it as a whole...

pac's resume post 2003 is good..but pre 2003 is **** and he was KO'ed twice