Originally posted by Horus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Kevin Jesus View PostYou should care, because dumb asses want to talk **** about a Mayweather's opponents but conveniently forget how they were seen as tough opponents before, but after, it's excuses excuses and more excuses.
that's why he doesn't get much credit.
look at pac-diaz. it was pac's 1st fight at 135. diaz was a top 3 135 fighter and a champion. but pac was the favorite and thus don't get much credit for doing something he was suppose to.
Comment
-
Once Again
Ask yourself a question.
Why is it that when both Pacquiao and Mayweather was active nobody rated Pacquiao higher than Mayweather, if Pacquiao suppose to have the better resume?
Dont you think People would have took note of this and had Manny Pacquiao
ranked higher then Floyd Mayweather.
in 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007, and 2008.
Why in all these years did nobody ever say you know Floyd Mayweather,
your #2 and Manny pacquiao is #1 ?
Why?
You why.
Because stats and facts dont lie.
the only reason pacquiao is #1 is because Mayweather retired.
he never overtook Mayweather. he just filled a vacancy.
huge difference.
I dont see how somebody can say pacquiao is better than Mayweather.. when throughout their whole career nobody has ever rated Pacquiao ahead of Mayweather..
throughout their whole career from beginning to end mayweather has fought better competition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postfloyd has won ONE fight his whole career where he was the underdog.
that's why he doesn't get much credit.
look at pac-diaz. it was pac's 1st fight at 135. diaz was a top 3 135 fighter and a champion. but pac was the favorite and thus don't get much credit for doing something he was suppose to.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Postum..try again...but seriously..you can actually defend Pac's resume b4 2003 when he was 34-2 in Asia?..
lol..come on man
Of course people like u who love cowards... nuff said about it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Flores View Post
Vanilla Ice sold more records than Rakim,
that means Hiphop is more accepting of Vanilla Ice than Rakim?
I know I'm responding to a butt plugged idiot,
but sales don't equate to quality.
McDonalds billions of burgers sold don't hold up to a classic Double Double which have sold exponentially less.
Pac doesn't have to announce fights on the eve of a superfight, nor does he have to retire or act a fool to drum up interest. All interest in Manny Pacquiao is genuine whereas Floyds is all contrived.
Manny is accepted, Floyd is just there with his loud mouth saying nothing and losing fans by the day.
Guess which fighter they're going to see instead?
No amount of coloring or font size changing is going to make anything more valid.
u cant compare a one hit wonder to a legend....it has to be on even terms
this is boxing...fans dont order PPV's unless they want to see the fight...so tell me why fans have ordered more PPV's for Mayweather than for PAC?...explain that
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Jesus View PostYou forgot to put....
De La Hoya(2 years older and 1 weight class below the version that Mayweather fought)
Hatton(2 years after Floyd beat the undefeated version)
you can add it.
also add that he fought marquez 4 divisions above jmm's best weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Jesus View PostFloyd fought De La Hoya and Hatton before Pacquiao did.
Packy is a naturally smaller man who is OVER achieving. Thats much more impressive than a naturally bigger guy who UNDER achieves against smaller, older, less talented guys.
Floyd did it to himself.
Comment
Comment