the extra muscle hanging off is in the guys avatar i pointed out earlier in the thread. its a pic of pac on the left and cotto on the right. when you close your eyes and think of pac is this what you see?
LMAO!!!
Cotto's arms are raised, so his ******* will be stretched, while Pacman's about to throw a punch, hence his chest muscles are more defined.
... and btw, you can grow your 'tache longer too by not clipping it.
do you believe manny pacquiao KOed ricky hatton without steroids?? he would have looked more like malignaggi without them. manny pacquiao disguises his use well because he is also getting more skillful.
it looked like it was mannys technique that purely got him that win.. but thats not the case at all. your little closed minds probably think god is doing a miracle for manny. as your mind develops and you are exposed to more things in life you will see that all that glitters is not gold, and where there is smoke there is fire. you will learn how common it is and easy to get away with. and you won't wonder anymore what those roid mongers were talking about
you better listen to me you little bitches. i am a prophet
im channelling this **** from satan himself
LMAO!!!
So you saying that by roiding up, you will develop quicker reflexes to throw a perfectly timed right hook while avoiding an incoming punch? Roids are for skill enhancement too? GTFO here...
No, I know muscle needs fuel. I've taken enough classes like kinesiology to know that.
We're talking about LEAN muscle aren't we? You're talking about body builders--the intent is too look big. Like some geniuses have said here--there are roids to make you look rip. Now, what is the point of all that calorie burning if roids can do most of the job for you? Why eat six times a day for just lean muscle if not to build actual muscle?
roids and hghs, are engineered to work in many way, genius.
what dont you understand about muscle mass being muscle mass. it doesnt matter if its lean, or bulky.
they all require alot more food to be maintaiend. you seem to think that eating 6 meals a day, means the mucle is natural. it has nothing to do wtih anything.
more muscle mass, requires alot more food to be maintained. why do you think the power-eater dude, kobayashi started lifting weights and packing on alot of muscle mass to make him a more effective power-eater? have you seen how big that mofo is
b/c Muscles require alot of food. fat doesnt. therefore, packing a bunch of muscle on this body, his body digest the food extremely fast b/c of all the muscle mass he has. thats also the way he keep from getting fat, being in the profession hes in
roids and hghs, are engineered to work in many way, genius.
what dont you understand about muscle mass being muscle mass. it doesnt matter if its lean, or bulky.
they all require alot more food to be maintaiend. you seem to think that eating 6 meals a day, means the mucle is natural. it has nothing to do wtih anything.
more muscle mass, requires alot more food to be maintained. why do you think the power-eater dude, kobayashi started lifting weights and packing on alot of muscle mass to make him a more effective power-eater? have you seen how big that mofo is
b/c Muscles require alot of food. fat doesnt. therefore, packing a bunch of muscle on this body, his body digest the food extremely fast b/c of all the muscle mass he has. thats also the way he keep from getting fat, being in the profession hes in
your logic again, is FAIL.
before he started lifting weights
after
See, I have no problem with the idea of muscle needing energy, calories to maintain it; that was never my point. I don't know why you keep repeating that.
Pacquiao has fought at 148lbs in both of his last fights. In both, let's assume he used steroids. In the Delahoya fight, Pacquiao showed no sign of power--no increased muscle tension or contraction that would otherwise be considered power or strength; he just looked bulky, on the other hand, when he fought Hatton he annihilated him. Tell me, do you see the disconnect there? Pacquiao annihilates Hatton at 140 and struggles in futile in trying to put Oscar away--who by the way, had no problems immediately going to his corner after the last round of their fight; he was a sitting duck for the roid muscle Pacquiao was carrying.
In both cases, he used steroids?
By the way, the Kobayashi picks are pointless. If you haven't noticed Pacquiao does moderate lifting unlike Kobayashi.
My other point was Pacquiao has been known to deep to 130s only several weeks into training camp. For his fight with Hatton, there was a strong possibility of losing muscle too fast. If Pacquiao was using roids to get lean muscle he could very well have been losing [it] during training--so it's possible that's somebody might have needed to inject him more with roids to get his muscle back-up which is ludicrous in my opinion.
See, I have no problem with the idea of muscle needing energy, calories to maintain it; that was never my point. I don't know why you keep repeating that.
Pacquiao has fought at 148lbs in both of his last fights. In both, let's assume he used steroids. In the Delahoya fight, Pacquiao showed no sign of power--no increased muscle tension or contraction that would otherwise be considered power or strength; he just looked bulky, on the other hand, when he fought Hatton he annihilated him. Tell me, do you see the disconnect there?
Hey, you can criticize all you want--it's straight from the man himself, Oscar. Pacquiao's punches didn't hurt. His sparring mates dont' consider Pacquiao physically strong but the roids that worked for Hatton didn't work for Oscar? Or does he have just a good chin?
Go head, imdazed, tell me, is it HGH, anabolic steroids, steroid variant. But, no, you're going to say "research" it, look it up, or give me some anecdote.
Comment