David Haye "I'll Blast Through Ruiz, Then I Want Klitschko"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pirao
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 3867
    • 131
    • 439
    • 10,171

    #91
    We can now see how much he wanted Klitschko

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #92
      Originally posted by Pirao
      We can now see how much he wanted Klitschko

      seriously Haye is a joke right now!!! I dont see him fighting a Klits if he doesnt fight one of them next, Valuev still has his rematch clause, Chagaev just won an eliminator to become the next mandatory so unless Haye digs his heels in and fight Vitali or Wlad now then thats it. Which pisses me off because he talked sooo much about wanting to fight them and he never did even when the timing and everything was alright.

      Comment

      • EuropeFightFan
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 135
        • 13
        • 0
        • 6,175

        #93
        Haye is living in a world of delusion if he thinks that he can be even relevant in the heavyweight division without boxing a Klitschko, never mind be the solution. The Klitschko brothers are the heavyweight division...and that's the fact of the matter. Maybe the Klitschko brothers should also call out the WBA like they are calling out Haye, or maybe a petition should be signed and sent to the WBA...to hell with the politics, that belt belongs to Wladimir by right as he beat Chagaev...none of the WBA's mandatory challengers are even half as deserving of a shot at that belt as either of the Klitschko brothers...every other major body despite all of their disagreements recognize a Klitschko brother as their champion, but the WBA have to be a thorn in the side of the sport and deny their rightful champion of their belt. Both boxing fans and insiders will have to put the glories of the past aside and focus on the present...if any body in any sport wants to deny the top two clubs/athletes in their business in favour of the third placed at best, do they deserve to be taken seriously as an awarding/governing body? Of course not. There are far too many title belts...the fact that the Klitschko brothers hold five between them in the WBC, WBO, IBO, IBF and Ring belts and it's still not enough says it all. I have to give credit to Floyd Mayweather for snubbing the WBA...now if the other alphabets followed suit like they did to the WBO in the 80's when they had the nerve to call Francesco Damiani "world champion" at a time Mike Tyson was destroying everything in his path. It's getting that bad...who in their right mind would even want to see Haye box Audley Harrison or anyone else at a time when the Klitschkos are dominating? That's not a "world title" fight, and it shouldn't even be recognized as such by anybody. It doesn't matter how old the WBA happen to be and who boxed for the belt in the 1970's, if they are not willing to have the very best heavyweights fighting for their belt any more, they don't deserve to be treated as relevant. And their lower division champions can box for other alphabet titles, there are after all plenty to go round.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP