Carl Froch-Andre Dirrell: PUNCH STATS- MUST SEE !!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Easy-E
    Gotta want it
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22686
    • 865
    • 1,739
    • 32,777

    #51
    Originally posted by Shattered Jaw
    This cannot be a serious post.

    Dirrell was warned TIME and TIME again for holding. The ref warned him around twice a round during the middle portion of the fight. He also went to his corner between rounds to warn up. What should Froch be warned for? Dirrell ducking low? Get out.
    Hitting behind the head.

    Comment

    • Shattered Jaw
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 5131
      • 261
      • 141
      • 11,649

      #52
      Originally posted by Check
      You don't know anything about boxing if you gave Froch more than 3 rounds. WAH WAH WAH Dirrell ran, Dirrell fell on his knees, Dirrell was bending his head down. Here's one, Dirrell just boxed Frochs ears completely off his head. You don't subtract points from a fighter just because YOU didn't like how he fought. Dirrell may of ran but he also landed. Froch hit air and nothing but air that whole night. Get a clue and he is a knockout waiting to happen.
      Disgraceful post again. Rather than just sing the tune of this made-up youtube video you should go and watch the fight again. Froch is a crude motha ****a but when he lands shots, you have to give him credit, even if they are not as snappy as Dirrell's. If Froch did not land then why was Dirrell's face bloodied, why was he stunned from a big Froch right hand (Froch had to chase him 20ft to get it in) and had Dirrell on ***** street, HOLDING on for dear life after a big left hook later in the fight?

      If you don't like Froch's style - fine. But when he lands his crude bombs you must still give him credit.

      Comment

      • Junito-Rulez
        BS's Tony Montana
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 6095
        • 375
        • 439
        • 13,296

        #53

        Comment

        • Easy-E
          Gotta want it
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 22686
          • 865
          • 1,739
          • 32,777

          #54
          Originally posted by Shattered Jaw
          Disgraceful post again. Rather than just sing the tune of this made-up youtube video you should go and watch the fight again. Froch is a crude motha ****a but when he lands shots, you have to give him credit, even if they are not as snappy as Dirrell's. If Froch did not land then why was Dirrell's face bloodied, why was he stunned from a big Froch right hand (Froch had to chase him 20ft to get it in) and had Dirrell on ***** street, HOLDING on for dear life after a big left hook later in the fight?

          If you don't like Froch's style - fine. But when he lands his crude bombs you must still give him credit.
          How did you score the fight?

          Comment

          • SplitSecond
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 23151
            • 1,715
            • 1,187
            • 85,044

            #55
            Originally posted by Easy-E
            show me your scoring round by round please.
            I need a laugh.
            probabley somethin like ''120-106 froch'' and will go on to say ''i gave froch a 10-8 round on round 10 because of the point deduction and also lets not forget round 11 where froch completely schooled dirrell, another 10-8 round''

            Comment

            • Check
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 16585
              • 677
              • 132
              • 26,287

              #56
              Originally posted by Shattered Jaw
              Disgraceful post again. Rather than just sing the tune of this made-up youtube video you should go and watch the fight again. Froch is a crude motha ****a but when he lands shots, you have to give him credit, even if they are not as snappy as Dirrell's. If Froch did not land then why was Dirrell's face bloodied, why was he stunned from a big Froch right hand (Froch had to chase him 20ft to get it in) and had Dirrell on ***** street, HOLDING on for dear life after a big left hook later in the fight?

              If you don't like Froch's style - fine. But when he lands his crude bombs you must still give him credit.
              Obviously the numbers aren't real but it isn't a stretch that Dirrell landed 3 shots to 1. Dirrel was on ***** street but not to the point of Froch in the last round. Lastly, I have always liked Froch and his style is fine with me. Lets just call a spade a spade. Dirrell may of ran and held too much for your liking but he did land the harder shots, more shots, and made Froch miss a ton. If thats not how you win a boxing match I don't know how you are supposed to.

              As for the bloody face I have watched the fight twice and never seen a punch that caused the blood. I would say the cut/blood was caused by rough housing on the part of both men.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP