Carl Froch-Andre Dirrell: PUNCH STATS- MUST SEE !!!
Collapse
-
Disgraceful post again. Rather than just sing the tune of this made-up youtube video you should go and watch the fight again. Froch is a crude motha ****a but when he lands shots, you have to give him credit, even if they are not as snappy as Dirrell's. If Froch did not land then why was Dirrell's face bloodied, why was he stunned from a big Froch right hand (Froch had to chase him 20ft to get it in) and had Dirrell on ***** street, HOLDING on for dear life after a big left hook later in the fight?You don't know anything about boxing if you gave Froch more than 3 rounds. WAH WAH WAH Dirrell ran, Dirrell fell on his knees, Dirrell was bending his head down. Here's one, Dirrell just boxed Frochs ears completely off his head. You don't subtract points from a fighter just because YOU didn't like how he fought. Dirrell may of ran but he also landed. Froch hit air and nothing but air that whole night. Get a clue and he is a knockout waiting to happen.
If you don't like Froch's style - fine. But when he lands his crude bombs you must still give him credit.Comment
-
-
How did you score the fight?Disgraceful post again. Rather than just sing the tune of this made-up youtube video you should go and watch the fight again. Froch is a crude motha ****a but when he lands shots, you have to give him credit, even if they are not as snappy as Dirrell's. If Froch did not land then why was Dirrell's face bloodied, why was he stunned from a big Froch right hand (Froch had to chase him 20ft to get it in) and had Dirrell on ***** street, HOLDING on for dear life after a big left hook later in the fight?
If you don't like Froch's style - fine. But when he lands his crude bombs you must still give him credit.Comment
-
probabley somethin like ''120-106 froch'' and will go on to say ''i gave froch a 10-8 round on round 10 because of the point deduction and also lets not forget round 11 where froch completely schooled dirrell, another 10-8 round''Comment
-
Obviously the numbers aren't real but it isn't a stretch that Dirrell landed 3 shots to 1. Dirrel was on ***** street but not to the point of Froch in the last round. Lastly, I have always liked Froch and his style is fine with me. Lets just call a spade a spade. Dirrell may of ran and held too much for your liking but he did land the harder shots, more shots, and made Froch miss a ton. If thats not how you win a boxing match I don't know how you are supposed to.Disgraceful post again. Rather than just sing the tune of this made-up youtube video you should go and watch the fight again. Froch is a crude motha ****a but when he lands shots, you have to give him credit, even if they are not as snappy as Dirrell's. If Froch did not land then why was Dirrell's face bloodied, why was he stunned from a big Froch right hand (Froch had to chase him 20ft to get it in) and had Dirrell on ***** street, HOLDING on for dear life after a big left hook later in the fight?
If you don't like Froch's style - fine. But when he lands his crude bombs you must still give him credit.
As for the bloody face I have watched the fight twice and never seen a punch that caused the blood. I would say the cut/blood was caused by rough housing on the part of both men.Comment
Comment