Carl Froch-Andre Dirrell: PUNCH STATS- MUST SEE !!!

[Landshark]

again please show me how...

You lot are talking as if the fight cannot be seen on youtube every round can be seen...et no one will dare point out how dirrell won...

Had it 114-113 Froch mate. The point deduction was legitimate, WAY to much holding and bending to Froch's waist, don't forget falling to the floor without being touched. UGLY fight, I expect AA vs Froch to be THE ugliest and boring of 2010.

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

This whole forum is a ****ing Sunday afternoon repeat of what happened a week before.

[keepthemhandsup]

again please show me how...

You lot are talking as if the fight cannot be seen on youtube every round can be seen...et no one will dare point out how dirrell won...

everyone showed you how


U JUST DON'T ***IN GET IT!!!!!!

[z0jo]

Froch won the fight and theres no way any of these fake stats will change that.

[Check]

It was an awful robbery. One of the biggest in the last 10 years, if we are talking about two high profile fighter on a big network. What cha gonna do though, honestly? Froch fought like a bum and stealing a victory won't save him from future defeats to better fighters. Just like Dirrell will lose more down the line because he isn't an elite fighter either. Dirrell is a better boxer and has a hell of a lot more upside than Froch though.

[Shattered Jaw]

It was an awful robbery. One of the biggest in the last 10 years, if we are talking about two high profile fighter on a big network. What cha gonna do though, honestly? Froch fought like a bum and stealing a victory won't save him from future defeats to better fighters. Just like Dirrell will lose more down the line because he isn't an elite fighter either. Dirrell is a better boxer and has a hell of a lot more upside than Froch though.

A disgraceful post. Perhaps one of the worst this decade.

[Check]

A disgraceful post. Perhaps one of the worst this decade.

You don't know anything about boxing if you gave Froch more than 3 rounds. WAH WAH WAH Dirrell ran, Dirrell fell on his knees, Dirrell was bending his head down. Here's one, Dirrell just boxed Frochs ears completely off his head. You don't subtract points from a fighter just because YOU didn't like how he fought. Dirrell may of ran but he also landed. Froch hit air and nothing but air that whole night. Get a clue and he is a knockout waiting to happen.

[Easy-E]

Dirrell clearly won that fight. No question about it. Complete and total robbery in Froch's hometown.

One of the funniest things about the video was the warnings from the referee. Froch was warned 7 times. Dirrell 0. And the ref took a point from Dirrell.
Unbelivable.

[Shattered Jaw]

Dirrell clearly won that fight. No question about it. Complete and total robbery in Froch's hometown.

One of the funniest things about the video was the warnings from the referee. Froch was warned 7 times. Dirrell 0. And the ref took a point from Dirrell.
Unbelivable.

This cannot be a serious post.

Dirrell was warned TIME and TIME again for holding. The ref warned him around twice a round during the middle portion of the fight. He also went to his corner between rounds to warn up. What should Froch be warned for? Dirrell ducking low? Get out.

[Easy-E]

again please show me how...

You lot are talking as if the fight cannot be seen on youtube every round can be seen...et no one will dare point out how dirrell won...

show me your scoring round by round please.
I need a laugh.