I've just rewatched and rescored Froch-Dirrell...

[hammerhiem]

I scored it:

Round 1: . 10-10.
Round 2: . 10-9 Froch.
Round 3: . 10-9 Dirrell.
Round 4: . 10-9 Froch.
Round 5: . 10-9 Dirrell.
Round 6: . 10-9 Dirrell.
Round 7: . 10-9 Froch.
Round 8: . 10-9 Dirrell
Round 9: . 10-9 Dirrell.
Round 10: . 9-9.
Round 11: . 10-9 Dirrell.
Round 12: . 10-9 Dirrell.

116-112 Dirrell.

I still have no idea how anyone can give either fighter the first round, neither of them landed a scoring punch.

[Butterball]

i will when people actually have something new to talk about

We are, we're rescoring the fight on second view. If you haven't seen it again, don't reply.

cause its not worth my time to post an essay

Sorry, does a thread REQUIRE your input? If you don't want to engage with the thread, **** off and post in another one.

[Pullcounter]

We are, we're rescoring the fight on second view. If you haven't seen it again, don't reply.

a second viewing isn't going to change any opinions. I know what I saw the first time.

Sorry, does a thread REQUIRE your input? If you don't want to engage with the thread, **** off and post in another one.

I am engaging in the thread. if you don't want people to post in it, don't post in NSB.

[Chunk..]

cause its not worth my time to post an essay

It's called backing up your opinion. Why was it a robbery?

[odogg8121]

IMHO, Froch didnt do enough to win the fight but Dirrell didnt ethier. U are suppose to beat the champ take his title, right? If u watched it really close I understand the arguement that Dirrell won the fight but to me he acted like a *****. So a SD to etheir one of them is fine by me, Dirrell needs to man up in his next fight, and Froch needs to show some of that power in his next fight....they both owe us one.

[Butterball]

a second viewing isn't going to change any opinions. I know what I saw the first time.

The entire point of the thread is watching the fight again. If you haven't then your presence in this thread has no meaning.

I am engaging in the thread. if you don't want people to post in it, don't post in NSB.

No, "engaging" means discourse, not just repeating yourself with the same sentence over and over and refusing to discuss. I post in NSB because I want discussion, not because I want arseholes.

You clearly have no interest in the topic - why not find a thread that you're interested in and post in that?

[Butterball]

Chunk, who you got in your avatar son?

[Chunk..]

Chunk, who you got in your avatar son?

I haven't got a clue who she is boss. I pinched it off some boob pic site.

[odogg8121]

Chunk, who you got in your avatar son?

yea I was lookin at that too lmao

[Butterball]

She's got a Miley Cyrus vibe about her.