I've just rewatched and rescored Froch-Dirrell...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • D-MiZe
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 25073
    • 1,061
    • 371
    • 75,542

    #11
    Dirrell hardly seemed upset after the fight, he accepted it and moved on.

    Comment

    • BattlingNelson
      Mod a Phukka
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 29838
      • 3,245
      • 3,190
      • 286,536

      #12
      One question: How did you keep your eyes open through this borefest a second time?

      Comment

      • REMOVED SHARK 97
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 3909
        • 134
        • 124
        • 5,753

        #13
        Originally posted by Pullcounter
        no need to rewatch and rejudge... dirrell got robbed in rottingham.
        Good call.

        Comment

        • Butterball
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 1303
          • 196
          • 190
          • 4,380

          #14
          Originally posted by BattlingNelson
          One question: How did you keep your eyes open through this borefest a second time?
          I must admit, there were a couple of rounds where I started to drift off and lose concentration.

          Comment

          • BattlingNelson
            Mod a Phukka
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 29838
            • 3,245
            • 3,190
            • 286,536

            #15
            Originally posted by Butterball
            I must admit, there were a couple of rounds where I started to drift off and lose concentration.
            I see.

            Those rounds was all Froch so if you go rewatch and rescore you'll have a card closer to my biased limey card.

            Comment

            • S.G.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 9412
              • 296
              • 635
              • 16,360

              #16
              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              One question: How did you keep your eyes open through this borefest a second time?
              I thought that apart from two or three of the late-middle rounds where Dirrell was excessively spoiling it was a decent watch myself.

              My card after my second time watching it:

              Round 01: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 02: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 03: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 04: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 05: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 06: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 07: 10-9 Froch
              Round 08: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 09: 10-9 Froch
              Round 10: 9-9 Draw
              Round 11: 10-9 Dirrell
              Round 12: 10-9 Dirrell

              Overall: 117-110 Dirrell

              IMO, you have to try really hard (and thus compromise the objectivity of your scoring) to give Froch rounds besides 7 and 9. I stand by my initial reaction to the fight; I believe it was a robbery.

              Comment

              • BattlingNelson
                Mod a Phukka
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 29838
                • 3,245
                • 3,190
                • 286,536

                #17
                Originally posted by S.G.
                I thought that apart from two or three of the late-middle rounds where Dirrell was excessively spoiling it was a decent watch myself.

                My card after my second time watching it:

                Round 01: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 02: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 03: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 04: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 05: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 06: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 07: 10-9 Froch
                Round 08: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 09: 10-9 Froch
                Round 10: 9-9 Draw
                Round 11: 10-9 Dirrell
                Round 12: 10-9 Dirrell

                Overall: 117-110 Dirrell

                IMO, you have to try really hard (and thus compromise the objectivity of your scoring) to give Froch rounds besides 7 and 9. I stand by my initial reaction to the fight; I believe it was a robbery.
                I didn't watch or score live. I watched and scored several days later knowing that the outcome was controversial. I scored for Froch as I gave the close rounds to him and I might subconciously have given Froch more credit than he should have had, who knows.

                The moral for me is that if you score a fight you need to do it live or at least have no knowledge of the result whatsoever. Otherwise your scoring might be skewed in a certain direction.

                Comment

                • Butterball
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 1303
                  • 196
                  • 190
                  • 4,380

                  #18
                  I'd argue that one wasn't a great stretch to give it to Froch.

                  Comment

                  • BattlingNelson
                    Mod a Phukka
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 29838
                    • 3,245
                    • 3,190
                    • 286,536

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Butterball
                    I'd argue that one wasn't a great stretch to give it to Froch.
                    Not even by a landslide as I did?

                    Comment

                    • Butterball
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 1303
                      • 196
                      • 190
                      • 4,380

                      #20
                      You biased Schneller

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP