Who has Better Boxing Skills: Pacquiao or Marquez

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • johncods
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 7760
    • 421
    • 58
    • 14,300

    #21
    But I dont give a **** if marquez is better technically because pac is on the cusp of making boxing history... So pac haters can suck it...
    Last edited by johncods; 11-01-2009, 05:53 PM.

    Comment

    • WhoreUs
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 15770
      • 556
      • 606
      • 20,363

      #22
      well considering pacquiao has the superior physical skills such as handspeed , power , etc. and marquez still is able to fight him to a draw......it's obvious marquez is the better technical fighter or at the very least better technically when they are fighting each other.

      Comment

      • h2k
        Interim Champion
        • May 2008
        • 988
        • 40
        • 22
        • 9,805

        #23
        Pacqiuao is better all around than marquez, marquez only effective when counter punching he doesn't have the hand and footwork speed that pac has thats why he's not effective fighting at the higher wieght class compared to pacquiao.

        Comment

        • h2k
          Interim Champion
          • May 2008
          • 988
          • 40
          • 22
          • 9,805

          #24
          And pac achievement if ever he win in his next fight will never be achieve by any boxer in the next 100 years or more that's the truth. imagine from flyweight champion upto welterweight champion while knocking out his oponent that's unbelievable.

          Comment

          • h2k
            Interim Champion
            • May 2008
            • 988
            • 40
            • 22
            • 9,805

            #25
            The thing with marquez and pacquiao is only just a bad mathchup for pacquiao.

            Comment

            • talip bin osman
              spider jerusalem!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 4256
              • 193
              • 65
              • 14,329

              #26
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              Definitely Marquez. His entire career is built around his technical ability making up for lack of dominant physical attributes. That's why he can't climb divisions like Pacquiao has.

              Pac isn't as bad a technical fighter as he is portrayed to be, but he isn't as good as Marquez.
              a study in contrast with roberto duran/james toney who relied on their great technical ability to scale the weight classes...

              Comment

              • sycomantz
                Banned
                • May 2009
                • 1959
                • 93
                • 54
                • 2,105

                #27
                Originally posted by johncods
                Marquez I dont think anybody in the game is as good technically as marquez.. But having said that pac has athletic talent that most boxers can only dream of...
                the **** are you talking about...did you not just see him get schooled by Mayweather.

                there is no one on may's level

                but JMM is easily a better boxer than pac

                Comment

                • sycomantz
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 1959
                  • 93
                  • 54
                  • 2,105

                  #28
                  Originally posted by h2k
                  And pac achievement if ever he win in his next fight will never be achieve by any boxer in the next 100 years or more that's the truth. imagine from flyweight champion upto welterweight champion while knocking out his oponent that's unbelievable.
                  he was 16 fool, how big do you expect him to be

                  Comment

                  • h2k
                    Interim Champion
                    • May 2008
                    • 988
                    • 40
                    • 22
                    • 9,805

                    #29
                    Originally posted by sycomantz
                    he was 16 fool, how big do you expect him to be
                    Yes his 16 so why other boxer can't fight at professional at the age of 16 and pacquiao is world champion at the age of 19 at flyweight.

                    Comment

                    • johncods
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 7760
                      • 421
                      • 58
                      • 14,300

                      #30
                      Originally posted by sycomantz
                      the **** are you talking about...did you not just see him get schooled by Mayweather.

                      there is no one on may's level

                      but JMM is easily a better boxer than pac
                      Hey moron... JMM was ****ed up by the weight... ****in fraud had a 15 pounds weight advantage with having all the athletic advantage and couldnt even KO marquez...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP