Would Floyd Stans.............

**aether** · 10-28-2009, 02:31 PM

Originally posted by Makavelli

be so adamant about reprimanding Shane for Roids if Shane was, let's say, at MW and not calling out Floyd for a fight?

i dont see them ripping Roy, or James Toney, or Botha or Fernando Vargas or any other past offenders?

why is that? ya'll fear shane or something?

please vote

much like floyd himself, his stans would do anything to discredit fighters that are a threat to him.

they are justifying floyd for not fighting top comp at welterweight. which make them fags.

**Jiddu Dali** · 10-28-2009, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by aether

much like floyd himself, his stans would do anything to discredit fighters that are a threat to him.

they are justifying floyd for not fighting top comp at welterweight. which make them fags.

no cause even b4 Mayweather returned many people tried to sweep this Mosley thing under the rug

**larry x** · 10-28-2009, 02:35 PM

nothing to do with floyd really...more so cotto fans saying margo(the man who punished cotto)doesnt deserve a payday cause he's a cheater and cotto shouldnt fight him....but they say he should rematch shane(an old guy who he's already beaten)who is also a known cheater

**larry x** · 10-28-2009, 02:36 PM

plus vargas is retired.and toney and roy jones are irrelevant...atleast toney was suspended and punished...mosley was never punished

**screwhead1** · 10-28-2009, 02:37 PM

floyd has been calling shane a steroid abuser long before shane wanted to even mention his name...

**Spacey1991** · 10-28-2009, 02:39 PM

Originally posted by Makavelli

be so adamant about reprimanding Shane for Roids if Shane was, let's say, at MW and not calling out Floyd for a fight?

i dont see them ripping Roy, or James Toney, or Botha or Fernando Vargas or any other past offenders?

why is that? ya'll fear shane or something?

please vote

Just the same as Pacquiao stans do when people are bashing there fighter over something mate, truth is... stans are stans, they are biased... that is why we call them stans.

**jrosales13** · 10-28-2009, 02:39 PM

Originally posted by Jiddu Dali

no cause even b4 Mayweather returned many people tried to sweep this Mosley thing under the rug

What do you mean by being swept under the rug? Really I didn't follow Roy case that well cuz honestly I didn't care. But, I don't remember him getting suspended. Did he get suspended? I know Vargas got suspended and Toney but that is cuz they tested positive. Shane never has. So Toney and Vagar got caught while Shane didn't. But, what about Roy Jones?

**Spacey1991** · 10-28-2009, 02:41 PM

Originally posted by aether

much like floyd himself, his stans would do anything to discredit fighters that are a threat to him.

they are justifying floyd for not fighting top comp at welterweight. which make them fags.

All stans for any fighter are like that, that is why we call them stans... why is that hard for people to understand. They are called stans because they are biased, so you should expect some **** to be said. Same as with stans of other fighters that are biased beyond belief.

**-MAKAVELLI-** · 10-28-2009, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by Spacey1991

Just the same as Pacquiao stans do when people are bashing there fighter over something mate, truth is... stans are stans, they are biased... that is why we call them stans.

PAC stans talk **** about destroying other fighters...NOT justifying why their fighter shouldn't fight someone...slight difference

PAC stans: Cotto? bring him on...he will fall in 1 round
PBF stans: Shane? he doesn't deserve a fight, he's a cheater

see?

Would Floyd Stans.............