Would Floyd Stans.............

[aether]

All stans for any fighter are like that, that is why we call them stans... why is that hard for people to understand. They are called stans because they are biased, so you should expect some **** to be said. Same as with stans of other fighters that are biased beyond belief.

your'e cool in my book . wish more fans would be like you.

i just don't get why some people don't want floyd to take on the number 1 ww. roids or not, it would enhance his legacy.

if floyd was my fav fighter, id want him to face either mosley or cotto/pac winner. shut up his critics.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

your'e cool in my book . wish more fans would be like you.

i just don't get why some people don't want floyd to take on the number 1 ww. roids or not, it would enhance his legacy.

if floyd was my fav fighter, id want him to face either mosley or cotto/pac winner. shut up his critics.

spacey sucks


true story

[Spacey1991]

What do you mean by being swept under the rug? Really I didn't follow Roy case that well cuz honestly I didn't care. But, I don't remember him getting suspended. Did he get suspended? I know Vargas got suspended and Toney but that is cuz they tested positive. Shane never has. So Toney and Vagar got caught while Shane didn't. But, what about Roy Jones?

I actually remember Reed saying something like the type of steroids Roy was using at the time were sold over the counter at drug stores or something and at that time wasn't considered steroids until later on. I aint saying this is true, just saying what I recall reading on here, and Reed wouldn't make any **** up.

Anyway, Shane took a lie detector test saying he knew nothing about it, and came up saying he was telling the truth... I mean there could be questions about the questions that were asked to him but at the end of the day he willingly took a lie detector test saying he never knew and it came up saying he was telling the truth, so that is that.

People are putting more enphasis on Floyd here, you guys gotta realise that we are talking about stans right now, not fans... there is a difference, stans are called stans because they are biased to **** towards a fighter, and will hang on to anything to discredit any other fighter.

Not ****ting on your thread Mak, you know were cool... just voicing my opinion.

[aether]

PAC stans talk **** about destroying other fighters...NOT justifying why their fighter shouldn't fight someone...slight difference



PAC stans: Cotto? bring him on...he will fall in 1 round
PBF stans: Shane? he doesn't deserve a fight, he's a cheater


see?

id agree to this.

pac stans say pac would do "this" to a fighter, some will say there are delusional *******s. after pac performs better than even his *******s expect, the same people would diminish that fighter beyond belief.

floyd stans defend floyd for not fighting those who clearly deserve a shot at him. he would the favorite anyways. why not give further proof? or that floyd is a bigger draw, has more money, have better sponsors, and other **** that has nothing to do with boxing itself. (Al Gay-man)

[Heru]

Floyd fans don't care about quiet black people.

[Spacey1991]

your'e cool in my book . wish more fans would be like you.

i just don't get why some people don't want floyd to take on the number 1 ww. roids or not, it would enhance his legacy.

if floyd was my fav fighter, id want him to face either mosley or cotto/pac winner. shut up his critics.

I would love to see him fight Cotto or Mosley, absolutely... I would like to see a Pacquiao fight more but I still wouldn't complain about seeing him fight Shane, or the winner of Cotto vs Pacquiao, a fight Cotto cannot be ruled out in.

I wont defend what Shane did in the past, of course steroids are bad... but at the end of the day to me... its in the past, he hasn't came up positive since then so hes learnt his lesson I guess suspended or not. He apparently took a lie detector test anyway and it came up saying he knew nothing about it.

I just wanna see some good fights happen, Shane vs Floyd would be one of them. I aint gonna ***** and moan and throw my toys out the pram if it doesn't happen, but it would still be great to see.

spacey sucks


true story

Fuck you!

[Spacey1991]

id agree to this.

pac stans say pac would do "this" to a fighter, some will say there are delusional *******s. after pac performs better than even his *******s expect, the same people would diminish that fighter beyond belief.

floyd stans defend floyd for not fighting those who clearly deserve a shot at him. he would the favorite anyways. why not give further proof? or that floyd is a bigger draw, has more money, have better sponsors, and other **** that has nothing to do with boxing itself. (Al Gay-man)

To me they are just both as bad as each other, one baits too much and the other defend too much.

And when it is the case of Floyd proving someone wrong Floyd stans bait to ****, and when its the case of Pacquiao doing something wrong they get all defensive.

Stans are stans, they are just biased... that is why there opinion aint as respected.

Anyway I gotta go out now... wont be back for another half our so wont reply again until later.