What do yall think of Roach's comments about Hatton

[Chunk..]

Hatton's only losses came to two P4P#1 ATG's, so Roach is a bit off base. Hatton was good, but just not on the elite level. Not many boxers are.

[ma51f]

Hatton was an ok champ at best. he was a fake world champ for most his career as a wbo champ. he did very well for himself, made millions out of drunken council estate football hooligans

[shade darkar]

Hatton was an ok champ at best. he was a fake world champ for most his career as a wbo champ. he did very well for himself, made millions out of drunken council estate football hooligans

wbo champ? i dont think he was uno!

[ironalex]

Hatton was an ok champ at best. he was a fake world champ for most his career as a wbo champ. he did very well for himself, made millions out of drunken council estate football hooligans

WBU idiot. Coming from a Khan fan? a mere con is the biggest fake champ out there. Yet another Khan fan who don't know **** about boxing.

[ma51f]

WBU idiot. Coming from a Khan fan? a mere con is the biggest fake champ out there. Yet another Khan fan who don't know **** about boxing.

what amir khan got to do with this thread? why bring him up?

fact is hatton was a bum, a disgrace to boxing. fought nobody his whole career until he had a big enough name and made millions fighting mayweather and pacquio

[IMDAZED]

At his best, Hatton was a good fighter with a style he had perfected for years. It was also the perfect style to beat a Kostya Tszyu. But the warnings signs existed then (who remembers the right uppercut old man Vince Phillips tagged him with) and any idea that Hatton might be elite should've gone out the window when he got an undeserved decision against Louis Collazo.

[ironalex]

what amir khan got to do with this thread? why bring him up?

fact is hatton was a bum, a disgrace to boxing. fought nobody his whole career until he had a big enough name and made millions fighting mayweather and pacquio

Why bring him up? because he is in your profile picture, and yet you are stating hatton was a bum and a paper champ, yet you have him as your profile picture...that makes you a hypocrit.

[ma51f]

Why bring him up? because he is in your profile picture, and yet you are stating hatton was a bum and a paper champ, yet you have him as your profile picture...that makes you a hypocrit.

khans only 22...fair enough if was 30 i could understand your point but hes not. his career has only begun, he's already done more the hatton did at this age..

[BoxCleva]

Hatton was a little overrated after the Tzsyu fight.

[ironalex]

khans only 22...fair enough if was 30 i could understand your point but hes not. his career has only begun, he's already done more the hatton did at this age..

Some fighters peak earlier than others, look at Fernando Vargas, Age for Age he was one of the best...look at him now. At that was a true warriour who fought the best, and was Khan's age. Khan will get exposed again and again you'll see.