I find it fascinating reading the opinions. Just wondering how some of these opinions are formed.
I personally like action fighters who are defensively responsible but who go into the ring looking to hurt guys and KO their opponents. I know this is seen as what "casual fans" are looking for in a fight. In this case I think the casuals are mostly right.
I can appreciate Floyd, Pernell Whitaker and a few others, just because they are so good at being defensive. But the idea that great boxing is "hit and don't get hit" holds true if the guy not getting hit is also able to mount an effective offense and able to hurt their opponent. No offense equals a boring fighter.
Bivol for instance basically just back pedals entire fights and stinks it up. His offense is weak and he doesn't carry much power. But some people here act like he is some all time great. I don't hate Bivol but I wouldn't buy a ppv for him alone.
I see people really disliking Benavidez. The guy at this point is almost single handedly making boxing exciting. He is fun to watch, beating guys up and not afraid to mix it up. I'd buy a ppv just for him. He is great to watch.
Is this all based on where people are from, like ethnic favoritism? I love any fighter who is a dog in the ring. I give more respect to fighters who come to do damage and ko guys.
How do you all form your opinions?
I personally like action fighters who are defensively responsible but who go into the ring looking to hurt guys and KO their opponents. I know this is seen as what "casual fans" are looking for in a fight. In this case I think the casuals are mostly right.
I can appreciate Floyd, Pernell Whitaker and a few others, just because they are so good at being defensive. But the idea that great boxing is "hit and don't get hit" holds true if the guy not getting hit is also able to mount an effective offense and able to hurt their opponent. No offense equals a boring fighter.
Bivol for instance basically just back pedals entire fights and stinks it up. His offense is weak and he doesn't carry much power. But some people here act like he is some all time great. I don't hate Bivol but I wouldn't buy a ppv for him alone.
I see people really disliking Benavidez. The guy at this point is almost single handedly making boxing exciting. He is fun to watch, beating guys up and not afraid to mix it up. I'd buy a ppv just for him. He is great to watch.
Is this all based on where people are from, like ethnic favoritism? I love any fighter who is a dog in the ring. I give more respect to fighters who come to do damage and ko guys.
How do you all form your opinions?

Comment