Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury, at 37 years old, announces ring return: 'I've got nothing better to do'

[Jack_sh*t]

He needs stay retired this time, the training videos of him look awful, I really thought it was Peter Fury on the bag. Tyson is done, someone please tell him the run is over, count your cash, and enjoy your family.

Tbf, he doesn't look anywhere near as awful as he did when he came back from oblivion, lost 140lbs in a year and defeated Wilder but got robbed of the decision. That turnaround was phenomenal.

[tokon]

Tbf, he doesn't look anywhere near as awful as he did when he came back from oblivion, lost 140lbs in a year and defeated Wilder but got robbed of the decision. That turnaround was phenomenal.

Clenbuterol works

[Jack_sh*t]

Clenbuterol works

I'm sure it does or Canelo wouldn't have used it.

Meanwhile, Fury tested positive for Nandrolone in 2015 and C0c41ne in 2016.

[PRINCEKOOL]

Tbf, he doesn't look anywhere near as awful as he did when he came back from oblivion, lost 140lbs in a year and defeated Wilder but got robbed of the decision. That turnaround was phenomenal.

Tyson Fury did not deserve the win vs Deontay Wilder I during their first fight 'Fury was backed up all night by Deontay Wilder, decked twice, and once extremely badly. At no point in Heavyweight History, has a contender ever won a title fight while producing that type of effort'.

Note: It is a complete over exaggerated myth, that Tyson Fury dominated and beat Wilder during their first fight 'he was for the large majority of the fight unable to hurt Deontay Wilder, or deter him from moving forward'.

Deontay Wilder out worked Tyson Fury in their first fight, and inflicted the most damage 'professional boxing, is scored via style, aggression and damage. When you analyse the fight, it will become very clear that Deontay Wilder had more effective aggression and a greater ability to inflict damage'.

If any fighter deserved to win the first fight 'I honestly believe that fighter was Deontay Wilder. But in retrospect, a draw was a fairly solid decision and of course? Was the catalyst for creating the greatest heavyweight rivalry since Rid**** Bowe vs Evander Holyfield'.

To conclude: Tyson Fury at his peak or in solid form is a miles better fighter than Fabio Wardley 'but people need to think back to his last fight. Fury for the first time ever in his career was apprehensive, to move forward vs a fighter in Oleksandr Uysk II that has never been renowned for his punching power or brute strength. He was also bounced around the ring like a ping pong ball in round 9'.

That is why stylistically at this stage of Tyson Fury's career 'potential fights vs Fabio Wardley and especially Anthony Joshua, are extremely difficult fights for him to win. Joshua has a combination of proven World to elite level power and boxing skill. And Fabio Wardly has proven power, and a level of resolve that is very impressive. And both of those fighters are Super Heavyweight fighters'.

Tyson Fury due to poor work ethic, has in my opinion sabotaged multiple big fights in his career again 'by the time he is back in fighting condition, Fabio Wardley may have lost his world titles' etc.

[The D3vil]

https://x.com/NadimElHaddad1/status/...600001128?s=20

[Jack_sh*t]

Tyson Fury did not deserve the win vs Deontay Wilder I during their first fight 'Fury was backed up all night by Deontay Wilder, decked twice, and once extremely badly. At no point in Heavyweight History, has a contender ever won a title fight while producing that type of effort'.

Note: It is a complete over exaggerated myth, that Tyson Fury dominated and beat Wilder during their first fight 'he was for the large majority of the fight unable to hurt Deontay Wilder, or deter him from moving forward'.

Deontay Wilder out worked Tyson Fury in their first fight, and inflicted the most damage 'professional boxing, is scored via style, aggression and damage. When you analyse the fight, it will become very clear that Deontay Wilder had more effective aggression and a greater ability to inflict damage'.

If any fighter deserved to win the first fight 'I honestly believe that fighter was Deontay Wilder. But in retrospect, a draw was a fairly solid decision and of course? Was the catalyst for creating the greatest heavyweight rivalry since Rid**** Bowe vs Evander Holyfield'.

To conclude: Tyson Fury at his peak or in solid form is a miles better fighter than Fabio Wardley 'but people need to think back to his last fight. Fury for the first time ever in his career was apprehensive, to move forward vs a fighter in Oleksandr Uysk II that has never been renowned for his punching power or brute strength. He was also bounced around the ring like a ping pong ball in round 9'.

That is why stylistically at this stage of Tyson Fury's career 'potential fights vs Fabio Wardley and especially Anthony Joshua, are extremely difficult fights for him to win. Joshua has a combination of proven World to elite level power and boxing skill. And Fabio Wardly has proven power, and a level of resolve that is very impressive. And both of those fighters are Super Heavyweight fighters'.

Tyson Fury due to poor work ethic, has in my opinion sabotaged multiple big fights in his career again 'by the time he is back in fighting condition, Fabio Wardley may have lost his world titles' etc.

Are you in fact Adelaide Byrd?
Effective aggression isn't the only criteria for scoring a fight and anyway, for most of the fight Wilder was given a boxing lesson. Fury landed more punches overall (84 to 71), controlling the fight in 9 out of 12 rounds, with a better connect rate (26% to 17%), landing more jabs (46-40) and power shots (38-31)

[Toffee]

At least the footage of him with his shirt off proves one thing... he really was retired.

[PRINCEKOOL]

Are you in fact Adelaide Byrd?
Effective aggression isn't the only criteria for scoring a fight and anyway, for most of the fight Wilder was given a boxing lesson. Fury landed more punches overall (84 to 71), controlling the fight in 9 out of 12 rounds, with a better connect rate (26% to 17%), landing more jabs (46-40) and power shots (38-31)

So Tyson Fury was unable to hurt Deontay Wilder, or back him up seriously during any point in the fight 'But you think he out boxed Deontay Wilder? Fury did not deserve the win, that was why he did not win'.

Tyson Fury was nearly removed from this planet in the 12th round by Deontay Wilder I 'and was traumatized by that event, for the rest of his career. That moment in round 12th when Tyson Fury was decked by Wilder, it is one of the most defining moments of Fury's boxing career and life'.

Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder I 'Fury only out landed Wilder by 13 punches. But overall Deontay Wilder was the aggressor in the fight, and threw more total punches. He backed up Fury all night, and landed the more damaging power punches. The evidenced of this, is that he scored two knock downs'.

There is absolutely no way, that Tyson Fury was robbed 'And he definitively 1000% did not deserve the win'.

To conclude: Tyson Fury did not out land Deontay Wilder by enough to dominate the fight, you have posted the statistics yourself 'Fury is marginally out landing Wilder, but simultaneously at the same time Wilder was backing Fury up all night and inflicted by far the most damage'.

Professional boxing is not amateur boxing 'Inflicting damage, and being the aggressor in the fight. Are major areas of scoring which impact the points system'.

Tyson Fury before he was officially beaten by Oleksandr Uysk I for the first time 'In my opinion, HE had already objectively lost two fights. And those fights are, Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder I, and Francis Ngannou vs Tyson Fury. In both of those fights, Fury's opponents inflicted the most damage, scoring knock downs and they were also the aggressors in the fight'.

That is why I stated that 'The verdict of a draw during Fury vs Wilder I, was actually in retrospect a solid decision. But if one fighter deserved the win, it was Deontay Wilder' etc.

[Smash]

Tyson Fury before he was officially beaten by Oleksandr Uysk I for the first time 'In my opinion, HE had already objectively lost two fights. And those fights are, Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder I, and Francis Ngannou vs Tyson Fury. In both of those fights, Fury's opponents inflicted the most damage, scoring knock downs and they were also the aggressors in the fight'.

i think u are the only person i have ever come across that says that wilder won the first fury fight, i literally cant remember anyone else with that opinion

the fight was pretty close i cant really remember it but most people had fury winning it like it or not as some of the rounds were low activity with fury just getting the better of them and racking up rounds like that, at best if u gave wilder a few of those scrappy rounds u could see a draw for him if i remember right that is

actually that boxing judge from california who had wilder winning 115 - 111 aggress with you

[Jack_sh*t]

So Tyson Fury was unable to hurt Deontay Wilder, or back him up seriously during any point in the fight 'But you think he out boxed Deontay Wilder? Fury did not deserve the win, that was why he did not win'.

Tyson Fury was nearly removed from this planet in the 12th round by Deontay Wilder I 'and was traumatized by that event, for the rest of his career. That moment in round 12th when Tyson Fury was decked by Wilder, it is one of the most defining moments of Fury's boxing career and life'.

Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder I 'Fury only out landed Wilder by 13 punches. But overall Deontay Wilder was the aggressor in the fight, and threw more total punches. He backed up Fury all night, and landed the more damaging power punches. The evidenced of this, is that he scored two knock downs'.

There is absolutely no way, that Tyson Fury was robbed 'And he definitively 1000% did not deserve the win'.

To conclude: Tyson Fury did not out land Deontay Wilder by enough to dominate the fight, you have posted the statistics yourself 'Fury is marginally out landing Wilder, but simultaneously at the same time Wilder was backing Fury up all night and inflicted by far the most damage'.

Professional boxing is not amateur boxing 'Inflicting damage, and being the aggressor in the fight. Are major areas of scoring which impact the points system'.

Tyson Fury before he was officially beaten by Oleksandr Uysk I for the first time 'In my opinion, HE had already objectively lost two fights. And those fights are, Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder I, and Francis Ngannou vs Tyson Fury. In both of those fights, Fury's opponents inflicted the most damage, scoring knock downs and they were also the aggressors in the fight'.

That is why I stated that 'The verdict of a draw during Fury vs Wilder I, was actually in retrospect a solid decision. But if one fighter deserved the win, it was Deontay Wilder' etc.

Fury won 9 rounds, Wilder won 3 & scored 2 knockdowns.
Simply swinging wildly and missing doesn't score points.
Even when Wilder detonated on him Fury miraculously recovered and actually won the rest of the round.
We're gonna have to agree to disagree.