Better Resume? Miguel Cotto or JMM?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cuauhtémoc1520
    Head Mexican in Charge
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 20824
    • 1,666
    • 569
    • 35,996

    #21
    Originally posted by shogunn
    are we talking about better opposition? regardless of wins or losses? or fight record/opposition.

    its close but cotto. Cotto's fought better opposition and has only 1 questionable loss (magic wraps)

    JMM doesnt have that strong of notables win, and no matter how you twist it, Manny DOESNT count. Casamayor, Juan Diaz, Old barrera, meh. He has losses to Chris John, Norwood, etc. also just lost to floyd.
    The question was resume not wins...


    JMM and it isn't even close.

    Comment

    • dans
      Journeyman
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2006
      • 6835
      • 212
      • 134
      • 13,712

      #22
      Originally posted by cuauhtemoc1496
      The question was resume not wins...


      JMM and it isn't even close.
      Shouldn't your resume be things you've accomplished? As in, wins?

      I don't put my dishwashing job on my resume when I apply to jobs because I quit in the middle of my shift. But you're saying I should recieve credit for this?

      If this is the case, Jermain Taylor has the best resume in boxing. The fact that he's lost 4 of his last 5 is irrelevant, right?

      Comment

      • Cuauhtémoc1520
        Head Mexican in Charge
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 20824
        • 1,666
        • 569
        • 35,996

        #23
        Originally posted by dans01234
        Shouldn't your resume be things you've accomplished? As in, wins?

        I don't put my dishwashing job on my resume when I apply to jobs because I quit in the middle of my shift. But you're saying I should recieve credit for this?

        If this is the case, Jermain Taylor has the best resume in boxing. The fact that he's lost 4 of his last 5 is irrelevant, right?
        That was the question posed. It's not as if JMM was destroyed in his losses, he arguably beat Pac twice and hung in there for 12 rounds with a bigger, stronger and faster pound4 pound fighter in Mayweather.

        Cotto is a good fighter, JMM is great.

        Comment

        • Jiddu Dali
          Banned
          • Aug 2009
          • 2938
          • 88
          • 62
          • 3,196

          #24
          Originally posted by dans01234
          Why when talking resumes to people include losses. That's only if we're talking strength of opposition.

          I really don't know who has a better resume, it's debatable, but how do you get credit for losing?

          "Mayweather, Pacquiao, blah blah" HE LOST. And frankly he was embarrassed by Floyd Mayweather, so how does he get credit for that.

          If this is the case, I'm going to become a boxer, raise huge sums of money and get my ass kicked by all the top fighters, then I'll be a legend.

          funny post...i agree

          Comment

          • Jiddu Dali
            Banned
            • Aug 2009
            • 2938
            • 88
            • 62
            • 3,196

            #25
            Originally posted by dans01234
            Shouldn't your resume be things you've accomplished? As in, wins?

            I don't put my dishwashing job on my resume when I apply to jobs because I quit in the middle of my shift. But you're saying I should recieve credit for this?

            If this is the case, Jermain Taylor has the best resume in boxing. The fact that he's lost 4 of his last 5 is irrelevant, right?
            LMAO@ Dishwasher position..lol

            and yeah if we're talkin about just NAMES...Taylors resume & Hopkins ****s on about everyones..lol

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP