Ok, so first and foremost, none of the above has anything to do with your claim that Jeff Lacy was a "bad dude". I never said Jeff Lacy wasn't humble, or a warrior. He is both. You said he was a "bad dude", which he's not. You hyped him up as a big win for Calzaghe, when it's not. When you were questioned on that take, you didn't defend your position and instead went to ad hominem attacks.
Such as, you said that if someone questions or talks down on Jeff Lacy they "don't know boxing" because he was on the Olympic team. Nothing to do with outside the ring reasons that you are now bringing to the table.
You can't on one hand say questioning someone because they achieved making the Olympic team means someone "doesn't know boxing" and that it's "wrong" to do so then on the other hand outright disrespect Olympic medalists and professional world champions, who achieved more than Jeff Lacy could ever dream of.
That makes you a hypocrite. You do understand the concept of hypocrisy?
Such as, you said that if someone questions or talks down on Jeff Lacy they "don't know boxing" because he was on the Olympic team. Nothing to do with outside the ring reasons that you are now bringing to the table.
You can't on one hand say questioning someone because they achieved making the Olympic team means someone "doesn't know boxing" and that it's "wrong" to do so then on the other hand outright disrespect Olympic medalists and professional world champions, who achieved more than Jeff Lacy could ever dream of.
That makes you a hypocrite. You do understand the concept of hypocrisy?

Comment