Fun fact, Mikey Garcia has beaten the same amount of reigning world champions as GGG and Loma combined

[Smash]

Ok so how do you know Haney beat Lomachenko because he was "favoured by the promoter?"

And secondly, have you grasped that the A side fighter isn't always the home fighter?

listen u dummy

if loma was the favoured fighter he would have won that fight, that should be clear to even an ass hat like yourself who is as thick as 2 planks of wood, no much thicker than that

haney got the nod in that fight as the majority of a siders do and have done and will do well into the future, hell even floyd himself got the nod clearly in his close ones

[IronDanHamza]

u are the thick one actually very thick

if u cant understand that a siders get more decisions for them than b siders u should immediately check yourself into hospital because u actually have NO BRAIN WHATSOEVER in your head, if u even have a head that is

Who said the A side don't tend to get more decisions in close fights than the B side? Oh yeah, no one.

How did you get that from my post?

YOU said Haney got the decision vs Loma, THEREFORE he's the A side and favoured by the promoter.

That, is RETARDED, and easily debunked like I've done in the following posts after you made that assertion. You're aware that you've done that, right? Just asserted your position based off nothing? You know what an assertion is.

Just because a fighter wins a close decision or even a bad decision doesn't equate them to being the A side or "favoured by the promoter". Do you need me to list the examples again that disprove your position or would you like a fresh one?

[Smash]

froch dirrell i wonder who won that one? dirrell fans might argue otherwise, teo sandor martin, again lots of people think teo lost, hell people even think ortiz beat teo, its not hard to see a pattern, well it is actually if u have no brain

[IronDanHamza]

listen u dummy

if loma was the favoured fighter he would have won that fight, that should be clear to even an ass hat like yourself who is as thick as 2 planks of wood, no much thicker than that

So WHY did Tim Bradley get the decision vs Pacquaio?

WHY did any B sider ever win a close decision?

How are you not seeing how non sensical and easily disproven your position is? It's wild.

haney got the nod in that fight as the majority of a siders do and have done and will do well into the future, hell even floyd himself got the nod clearly in his close ones

Ok, and?

Your point being what?

Floyd was the B side vs Oscar and won the decision, on a GOLDEN BOY SHOW. The fighter WAS the literal promoter.

How is that possible?

[Smash]

Who said the A side don't tend to get more decisions in close fights than the B side? Oh yeah, no one.

How did you get that from my post?

YOU said Haney got the decision vs Loma, THEREFORE he's the A side and favoured by the promoter.

That, is RETARDED, and easily debunked like I've done in the following posts after you made that assertion. You're aware that you've done that, right? Just asserted your position based off nothing? You know what an assertion is.

Just because a fighter wins a close decision or even a bad decision doesn't equate them to being the A side or "favoured by the promoter". Do you need me to list the examples again that disprove your position or would you like a fresh one?

ive stated my position clearly u are too thick to understand i get it

now im not going to go the next 12 days trying to explain it over and over again to the ultimate thicko on the planet so ill bid u good night & happy drooling i guess

u go on to the next post and see how that goes, thanks

[IronDanHamza]

froch dirrell i wonder who won that one? dirrell fans might argue otherwise, teo sandor martin, again lots of people think teo lost, hell people even think ortiz beat teo, its not hard to see a pattern, well it is actually if u have no brain

How many times are you going to give an example of where the A side won a close decision before you realise it's not proving anything?

Yes, of course, the A side tends to get the nod on close decisions but by the simple fact the B side has won close decisions a PLETHORA of times means that if fighter A wins the decision (in that case Haney) it does not prove they are "favoured by the promoter" nor does it make them the A side on that basis.

Which part aren't you getting? I'll try and dumb it down.

[IronDanHamza]

ive stated my position clearly u are too thick to understand i get it

now im not going to go the next 12 days trying to explain it over and over again to the ultimate thicko on the planet so ill bid u good night & happy drooling i guess

u go on to the next post and see how that goes, thanks

Yes I'm very aware of your position, that's not been disputed.

Your position is, I quote;

"devin haney was promoted by bob arum for the loma fight, who he clearly favoured as he got the nod over loma"

Are you reading the examples where the A side and favoured fighter didn't win close decisions thus making your position debunked?

I genuinely don't know how I can explain this in an easier way to understand.

It's gone from you not even knowing what the A side even is to a point where it doesn't look like you can even read.

[TheProudLunatic]

That beyond pitiful MW "run" of his !!!!!!
No one wants to discuss that BS run
Just throw a blanket over it and leave it alone

TWO credible opps
1 official W in 4 tries vs them

Can-crusher indeed

[El_Mero]

Funniest thing is that Loma’s daddy, Arum, said he didn’t want to make the fight

False. But then again, you know that