Comments Thread For: Diego Pacheco vs. Hamzah Sheeraz ordered for vacant WBO belt

[rudy]

Better fight than Christian for Sheeraz

[RockyKO]

This is a pretty good fight tbh. I would have liked to see it later on but there isn't that much excitement at 168. I heard that on the PBC card on Jan 31st it's going be Berlanga vs Resendiz for the WBA belt? I hope I'm wrong because Berlanga definitely does not deserve a championship fight rn.

[Corelone]

Im going with Shareez. He looks better than Pacheco all around. Not much better, but enough to use the hometown advantage. Shareez can win anywhere, but Frank and Eddy will agree to the UK. 3 points for Shareez out the gate, Pacheco hasnt the power.

[CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart]

It's a good fight in my opinion. I think that Sheeraz takes it. He's more explosive than Pacheco and I can see him hurting Pacheco and finishing him.

[Superbee]

I thought the WBC had ordered Sheeraz - Mbilli for the vacant belt? Wonder which route he will go.

I know it sucks ... But I wouldn't mind Mbilli / Martinez II on the same card as co-main ... Unfinished business needs a resolution...

[Elastic Recoilz]

Sheeraz has power, Pacheco doesn't - this is the difference.

[Bronx2245]

Would be nice if this could be on the undercard of Lopez vs. Stevenson!!!

[Coverdale]

This is a pretty good fight tbh. I would have liked to see it later on but there isn't that much excitement at 168. I heard that on the PBC card on Jan 31st it's going be Berlanga vs Resendiz for the WBA belt? I hope I'm wrong because Berlanga definitely does not deserve a championship fight rn.

He dropped to #12 with the WBA and has not fought since getting KO'd, surely even the WBA couldn't justify this.

Does anyone know why the WBC have decided not to just email Mbilli the full belt? I'm glad they haven't, just curious.