Tweet
Here you go again making no sense, gobbledygo*k. If I try decipher what your saying ill end up talking nonsense too, that's why best to ignore trolling.
Kirkland laings win over Duran is better than floyds win over pac. But Kirkland not greater than pac, and neither is floyd. But nobody would care how great Kirkland win is, Duran greater than kirland.
It dont matter how good or poor floyds win over pac is. Pacs greater, with so many more wins, over different opponents and more dominant over common opponents with common opponents acknowledging pac s toughest.
I can't imagine srr having any legit claim to be ing best of his time with only 48 wins, when all his peers have done so much more with 80 win records.
People who rate floyd get too carried away with the hard to hit persona
Kirkland laings win over Duran is better than floyds win over pac. But Kirkland not greater than pac, and neither is floyd. But nobody would care how great Kirkland win is, Duran greater than kirland.
It dont matter how good or poor floyds win over pac is. Pacs greater, with so many more wins, over different opponents and more dominant over common opponents with common opponents acknowledging pac s toughest.
I can't imagine srr having any legit claim to be ing best of his time with only 48 wins, when all his peers have done so much more with 80 win records.
People who rate floyd get too carried away with the hard to hit persona
Comment