The GOAT! Pacquiao or Floyd or Crawford?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
-
You would lose faith of that list if you counted the number of no hopers and debuts opps
No way could there have been 10 quality guys back then. Much less 100
Comment
-
This is a good debate for best fighter of the 21st century and that's about it. Maybe I have Mayweather in the top 5 in the Welterweight and possibly Pacquiao in the top 5 or 10 at 122? But boxing has very rich lore and I don't know the history that well at 122 pounds to make that determination.Comment
-
👎 1Comment
-
I just think a lot of modern day fighters would really struggle to travel back in time, and maintain their form 'for some of the reasons, I stated in my first post in this thread'.
Dmitry Bivol from what I know, has never been a fighter who has massively used weight draining tactics 'but he is still a modern day fighter, who has only fought in 12 round championship fights. And predominantly uses modern day training practices, and supplementation most likely'.
Dmitry Bivol has not trained for 15 or 45 round championship fights.
Note: That is why I have specifically highlighted and spoken about Floyd Mayweather Junior, for the large majority of his career 'he trained like a old school fighter, but? He was competing against modern day fighters. And he was the best fighter of his generation'.
Also heavyweight fighters like Mike Tyson, while being trained under Cus D'Amato, Teddy Atlas, Kevin Rooney and even in the early 90's 'Mike Tyson was another all-time great fighter, who predominantly trained like a old school fighter'.
You only have to compare Mike Tyson's training practices, to Oleksandr Uysk and Anthony Joshua 'the latter two fighters are bi-products of modern sports. Whereas Mike Tyson was the bi-product of century's of empirical evidence when it comes to boxing training'.
To conclude: Floyd Mayweather Junior, Bernard Hopkins, Mike Tyson, Lennox Lewis, Carl Froch 'those are some of the modern day fighters, who I think could travel back in time and maintain a solid level of form'.
Many of the modern day fighters, who I do appreciate 'and rate very highly within this era, would struggle. That is why you won't really ever see me, just automatically rate a modern day fighter higher than fighters who fought during the boxing era's pre - 1980. Totally different competitive landscape, and demands were being put on the athletes' etc.
Last edited by PRINCEKOOL; 11-27-2025, 11:55 AM.😎 1Comment
-
😂 1Comment
-
of course these guys would fight up to twice PER MONTH
Fighting frequently instead of long training camps with spars
This is a good debate for best fighter of the 21st century and that's about it. Maybe I have Mayweather in the top 5 in the Welterweight and possibly Pacquiao in the top 5 or 10 at 122? But boxing has very rich lore and I don't know the history that well at 122 pounds to make that determination.- Sugar Robinson
- Harry
- Henry
- Sam
- Ezzard
- Willie
- Muhammad
- Roberto
- Sugar Leonard
- FLOYD
- Joe
- Benny
- Pernell
- manny
- Mickey
- Jimmy
- Archie
- Carlos
- Marvin
- Barney
- Tony
- Julio Cesar
- Rocky
- Larry
- Gene
- Jack
- TBud
👍 1Comment
-
Comment

Comment