Comments Thread For: Joseph Parker: 'I did not take any prohibited substance'

[Smash]

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky"

[pollywog]

Can't help but think that losing to Wardley has increased his chances of a ban.

If he'd won, people would be scrambling to save him because of the fights ahead.

Similarly, Benn got support because that Eubank money fight was always there for him. If it wasn't he would have been left hung out to dry.

If he'd won, they would have stripped him, banned him and promoted Wardley anyway.

Seems like the fix was always in...

[archiemoore1]

Joe "Blow" Parker

[57Blues]

the damage is done as far as guilt or innocence, argue with science and you loose esp with the history of fighters who say " who me never ' and then surprise surprise as Gommer once said ..............then regret and never again and back to boxing. Nothing changes it just moves from person to person.

[joe strong]

If he'd won, they would have stripped him, banned him and promoted Wardley anyway.

Seems like the fix was always in...

I’m a Parker fan… Give it a rest lol! ******* just don’t show up in your system. Maybe not fight nightbut prior to it is not out of the question. He’s buddies with Tyson Fury. He has been investigated for moving meth & his buddy has ties to the Kinihan Clan…

[pollywog]

I’m a Parker fan… Give it a rest lol! ******* just don’t show up in your system. Maybe not fight nightbut prior to it is not out of the question. He’s buddies with Tyson Fury. He has been investigated for moving meth & his buddy has ties to the Kinihan Clan…

I posted in the Hëll Nauwww thread about Parker's likely meth association.
...and some guy, Remmy12 on BN24 posted this...

I don't want to speak on his guilt or innocence, but just something to consider.

As someone who was tested 3 times randomly every month for over a year for medical reasons, I had about 6 or 7 positive tests for ******* specifically when I hadn't used any myself but had been around ppl who did use regularly.

Part of the problem is that tests can show positive for such tiny amounts that sharing a cigarette with someone who had used or handled ******* a few hours earlier can be enough for a positive test, not to mention over %85 of all cash in the states would test positive for *******.

Now I didn't live a clean and dedicated pro boxer lifestyle so I don't expect Parker to be regularly hanging out with ppl who use or handle *******, but we know some of his training partners absolutely do so its not like its impossible that its just a case of cross contamination, something as simple as handling money from someone who used it to snort ******* or handled the money after handling ******* (packaging, selling w.e.,), not washing hands and eating food with those same hands (burger for example) would be enough to result in positive tests.

Also keep in mind ******* is far more prevalent in what is considered to be "higher society" (high income, bankers, doctors etc.) Than many ppl may realize and unless u get involved in it (weather using ******* or selling it) u won't realize just how common it really is.

Returning a tainted sample for coke while chilling in elite boxing circles wouldnt appear that difficult to do.