Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao II talks initiated

[boxinggod101]

And in such a dull and repetitive way, too.

lol they have been repeating the same bs for a decade +.

[IronDanHamza]

I don't have to make a claim for something that actually happened

No that is what you did. You made a claim that multiple things happened. That in fact, didn't.

That's the part where you prove the things you claimed happened, by using time stamps.

Floyd was actually holding, and you acknowledged that even fake counted the holds like a good little Floyd excuse boy

Yes, he held a total of 21 times in a 12 round fight, which is objectively not excessive.

These are facts.

[SouthpawRight]

No that is what you did. You made a claim that multiple things happened. That in fact, didn't.

That's the part where you prove the things you claimed happened, by using time stamps.



Yes, he held a total of 21 times in a 12 round fight, which is objectively not excessive.

These are facts.

manny does his best work coming forward and at shorter ranges

therefore it's manny's job to know anti-clinch techniques and cut off the ring

Floyd's fights were never advertised as brawls

making a firefight out of it was entirely manny responsibility

[djtmal]

Yes, he held a total of 21 times in a 12 round fight, which is objectively not excessive.

Not excessive for you because you a Floyd boy, but Manny held I am quite sure 0, and Floyd ruined the action by holding on for dear life

Count how many times the ref warned Floyd about holding

[IronDanHamza]

Not excessive for you because you a Floyd boy, but Manny held I am quite sure 0, and Floyd ruined the action by holding on for dear life

Count how many times the ref warned Floyd about holding

He barely warned him, because the holding objectively wasn't excessive. That doesn't support your argument, it does the opposite.

Do you have timestamps for your imaginary claims or not?

[djtmal]

He barely warned him,

He didn't warn him at all, because his job was not to warn him

[IronDanHamza]

He didn't warn him at all, because his job was not to warn him

He did warn him, actually.

Just not much because he wasn't holding excessively, which again doesn't support your argument but does the opposite.

Do you have timestamps for your imaginary claims or not?

[djtmal]

He did warn him, actually.

So if he warned him after 2 holds, why didn't he take a point after the 20th

[djtmal]

Just not much because he wasn't holding excessively,

He was holding onto Manny as if his life depended on it.

He made a spectacle of himself running and holding

I saw a running headlock and a dive on top of Manny's back

[IronDanHamza]

So if he warned him after 2 holds, why didn't he take a point after the 20th

He warned him after the 6th hold (round 2) and then from that point on there was only highest 2 in any of the remaining 10 rounds and most of them less than 2 so there was no reason for the ref to warn again because the holding was objectively not excessive.