Comments Thread For: Ranking Terence Crawford above Floyd Mayweather ?can be self-serving?

[MulaKO]

Floyd didn't just beat great fighters. HOW you won over great opponents should be weighted also

Floyd easily beat them

of the 9 only ONE Oscar managed to take more than 3 clear rounds

Who’s worried about another man NOW

You should really try thinking before posting your dumbass comments
I know you can’t do that cause it’s hard for a 12 year old kunt to do that

Defending little Floyd just like a 12 year old kunt would


L M F A O at this dumbass kunt

[SouthpawRight]

Who’s worried about another man NOW

You should really try thinking before posting your dumbass comments
I know you can’t do that cause it’s hard for a 12 year old kunt to do that

Defending little Floyd just like a 12 year old kunt would


L M F A O at this dumbass kunt

u have two children yet continuously get outsmarted by 12 year olds

whos’s sonning who

Why do yours have a 12 year old grandpa

[MulaKO]

u have two children yet continuously get outsmarted by 12 year olds

whos’s sonning who

Why do yours have a 12 year old grandpa

Make it make sense you f@ckin kunt

If you had any clue about anything it’s how to be a dumb kunt

Y D K S A B

[SouthpawRight]

Make it make sense you f@ckin kunt

If you had any clue about anything it’s how to be a dumb kunt

Y D K S A B

says the married incel who was put on a long holiday due to his illogic rage of frustration

[MulaKO]

says the married incel who was put on a long holiday due to his illogic rage of frustration

Y D K S A B

Try Again

[Oregonian]

I can see you are trying to downplay pac. Pac fought many of the opponents floyd fought and they say pac was toughest opponent, so I'll take what you say with a pinch of salt.
So everyone bud fought were killers were they brook, khan, porter, spence. You.think I can't (or rather people cant, as I'm not boastful) think of 100 things to say about these opponents, or about buds undisputed claims? Did bud even fight once a year, so what if bud stepped up 2 divisions, well done bud, now move on?
Pac s campaign at 147 for 10 years he fought good fighters

———
Why do you do this ALL the time? Instead of answering factual questions, you introduce new arguments. Every single time.

Name one guy that Bud beat that was weight drained because of dubious catchweight?
Name one guy that was coming off a loss?

And name the “good fighters” that PAC fought at 147 who weren’t coming off spectacular losses except for Thurman?

This is a pretty simple request.

[SouthpawRight]

———
Why do you do this ALL the time? Instead of answering factual questions, you introduce new arguments. Every single time.

Name one guy that Bud beat that was weight drained because of dubious catchweight?
Name one guy that was coming off a loss?

And name the “good fighters” that PAC fought at 147 who weren’t coming off spectacular losses except for Thurman?

This is a pretty simple request.

ah oh the kryptonite of manny fans and his bane

[Oregonian]

ah oh the kryptonite of manny fans and his bane

——-
unbelievable!!
watch how he continues to introduces different argument that have nothing to do with anything.

[hugh grant]

———
Why do you do this ALL the time? Instead of answering factual questions, you introduce new arguments. Every single time.

Name one guy that Bud beat that was weight drained because of dubious catchweight?
Name one guy that was coming off a loss?

And name the “good fighters” that PAC fought at 147 who weren’t coming off spectacular losses except for Thurman?

This is a pretty simple request.

I can name many fighters in buds resume that werent especially good regardless if they were weight drained, or not. Or coming off of loss, or not if you want! Just because your not weight drained or coming off of loss don't make you good. Yes the Nel o and spence wins were good, but before that bud getting criticism was quite normal
Before bud best spence and was self pro claiming he was no1 pfp, he was widely ridiculed. I guess because all those guys he best that weren't drained and not coming off of loss weren't considered particularly nasty bad asses!
What, pac don't deserve credit as he beat clottey coming off of a controversial loss to cotto? Just where are you going with your questions?

[Oregonian]

I can name many fighters in buds resume that werent especially good regardless if they were weight drained, or not. Or coming off of loss, or not if you want! Just because your not weight drained or coming off of loss don't make you good. Yes the Nel o and spence wins were good, but before that bud getting criticism was quite normal
Before bud best spence and was self pro claiming he was no1 pfp, he was widely ridiculed. I guess because all those guys he best that weren't drained and not coming off of loss weren't considered particularly nasty bad asses!
What, pac don't deserve credit as he beat clottey coming off of a controversial loss to cotto? Just where are you going with your questions?

———
As great as PAC is/was, he fought guys like Broner, Brandon Rios who moved to 147 for that fight, Mosley, weight drained Oscar etc (I’ve already given you a list of them guys), those were terrible opponents. You can say whatever you want, you cannot justify those opponents.
Even in your response, you mention just one guy -Clottey. Every other name I listed you have ignored.