Could Crawford have beaten GGG as well at 168?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DeeMoney
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 2145
    • 1,109
    • 429
    • 29,954

    #51
    Originally posted by RuleOfTheSpear

    Prime GGG was losing to Kell Brook in the scorecards btw.

    Dude had nothing except being an unrelenting pressure puncher like Spence or Margarito. But he's a lil bit more calculated. He has a better chin than both for sure.
    That wasn't prime GGG, or at the very least that was tail end of prime GGG. He was what 34 for that fight? Most MWs primes are over before that.

    Prime GGG was the early 2010s, you can criticize his resume during that time, and thats fair, but at least evaluate him for that time frame; not the late 2010s older version.

    Comment

    • DeLorean
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 849
      • 62
      • 12
      • 7,389

      #52
      168? little g didnt do nothing there. i got bud

      Comment

      • daggum
        All time great
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 43567
        • 4,593
        • 3
        • 166,270

        #53
        Originally posted by RuleOfTheSpear

        Prime GGG was losing to Kell Brook in the scorecards btw.

        Dude had nothing except being an unrelenting pressure puncher like Spence or Margarito. But he's a lil bit more calculated. He has a better chin than both for sure.
        do you even watch the fights? those cards were laughable. round 1 ggg badly hurts brook and clearly wins the round. round 2 brook wins a back and forth round. round 3 ggg knocks brook down but the ref "missed" it. round 4 ggg clearly wins. round 5 he stops brook. brook won 1 round and you are pretending like he was on the verge of victory or something or that exposed ggg lol

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP