Comments Thread For: ?Most would fight Jake Paul?: ?Tank? Davis? former opponent understands the business

[TheProudLunatic]

Because we have disposable income and you don't!

How to say you have no taste in entertainment without actually saying it

Trash attracts trash
Like flies on shlt

[Grandma Lover]

Oh my bad. For all you broke azz Karl Marx mothafuqkers who don't know who Adam Smith is. LOOK IT UP!!!

What does being broke have to do with Adam smith?

[Grandma Lover]

How to say you have no taste in entertainment without actually saying it

Trash attracts trash
Like flies on shlt

This is fvkcing perfect you fvkcing idiots are on the same team and still bumping heads lmfao

[TheProudLunatic]

This is fvkcing perfect you fvkcing idiots are on the same team and still bumping heads lmfao

I hope not

[TheProudLunatic]

When a draw is announced, MFers who have disposable incomes will cry about it being fixed

[BlackRobb]

Why do people pay to see these shltshows is the real question

Many boxing fans are not the brightest bulbs on the tree or the sharpest tools in the shed. Why do you think Bob Arum left a good job as a U.S. Attorney, and Lou Dibella left good money as an HBO executive to get into boxing? There's lots of money to be made separating the IQ-deficient from their money.

[Yaconcha]

The analogy likely refers to a situation where an underdog fighter (like Stanley Ketchel and Jake Paul) briefly gains the upper hand against a dominant champion (like Jack Johnson and Gervonta Davis) before being decisively defeated by the champion's swift, powerful counterattack. In the actual Ketchel vs. Johnson fight, Ketchel dropped Johnson, but Johnson quickly recovered and knocked Ketchel out cold with a single, devastating punch, embedding Ketchel's teeth in his glove, while the analogy suggests Davis would similarly punish Paul for his brief success.