There are some crazy people in this world. Dirrell clearly yes thats clearly won the fight and it was not by a 'couple of rounds' if you gave froch more than 3 rounds you are either blind or cant score a fight properly, i think this guy who wrote this is british as he used the phrase bloody nora, cmon this is ruining boxing froch didnt land anything they definately need compubox in this tourney, dirrell boxed dont hate him for boxing all this negativity talk what the ****, im british myself and im telling you dirrell is a much better fighter than froch, aa wasnt impressive either, i think dirrells gona turn up the heat on him and skool him i cant wait to see what people say then lol, be like well maybe he did beat froch? Let me check that **** out again, also i think taylor should continue, always bet on the underdog!
Super Six Starts Slowly: A Ringside Report and Analysis
Collapse
-
dirrell got robbed... yeah, it was a stinker of a fight and dirrell ran and held, but he made froch look like an amatuer.
the AA/JT fight wasn't all that great either until the KO. AA fought as negatively as Dirrell did... he stayed in his shell and didn't open up except a few times.
because of the robbery, the super six is actually the super sux.
That was hilarious dude, Dirrell got robbed, I almost pissed myself laughing! Diarrhea Dirrell fights like he always has the RUNS! This dude is a joke and should do us all a favor and never box again, period! He ran all night, and everytime he was even breathed on by Froch he held on for dear life. If that's your idea of getting robbed you need to pick another sport to watch! Froch won that fight by UD in my eyes, and I'm American not European and I can't stand to see Dirrell fight! It doesn't matter anyways because Kessler would of schooled Diarrhea Dirrell like the amatuer that he is. Right now if you don't think that the front runners in this tournament aren't Kessler and Abraham then you're crazy.
Comment
-
There are some crazy people in this world. Dirrell clearly yes thats clearly won the fight and it was not by a 'couple of rounds' if you gave froch more than 3 rounds you are either blind or cant score a fight properly, i think this guy who wrote this is british as he used the phrase bloody nora, cmon this is ruining boxing froch didnt land anything they definately need compubox in this tourney, dirrell boxed dont hate him for boxing all this negativity talk what the ****, im british myself and im telling you dirrell is a much better fighter than froch, aa wasnt impressive either, i think dirrells gona turn up the heat on him and skool him i cant wait to see what people say then lol, be like well maybe he did beat froch? Let me check that **** out again, also i think taylor should continue, always bet on the underdog!Comment
-
Dirrell wasn't boxing he was merely stopping from from fighting and wasn't willing to fight himself. Dirrell held, ran and wasn't willing to engage therefore he lost. Froch looked like ****, he'll be easy pickings for both Kessler and AA.
It's good to see a lot of people in the sport saying that it wasn't a robbery that indeed Froch won. Froch didn't win the fight as much as Dirrell lost it, he came to beat a champion and he did anything but.Comment
-
What a horrible article. In my oppinion. both fights were entertaining, and Froch vs Dirrell was much more entertaining of the two. I havn't heard anyone I know complain about the quality of those fights. Everyone enjoyed both of them. The only thing this article brought was Shaw and Dirrell not complaining about a fight they loss. (and they loss on my card as well..115-112) I thoroughly enjoyed Froch Dirrell and feel it was definetly a good start to the tournament. This is the coolest thing going on in boxing hands down, and round 2 should provide just as entertaining if not more entertaing fights. What a clownComment
Comment