Not sure, but I think Rolly has a punchers chance. He was very hesitant with his volume against Ryan, but I think he wins if he increases his punch output
I agree rolly has a punchers chance but i favor pacman and i believed he can knock out romero if the fight ever happen.
only 1% believed that the 46 YEARS OLD, 4 years retired and 2 months training will be annihilated by the PRIME YOUNG WBC CHAMPION that's why pacman was like 3-1 underdog but it turns out that barrios was just a tune up fight for the 46 YEARS OLD.
Great to see an OBJECTIVE Floyd fanboy who can also appreciate the greatness of Manny Pacquiao!
Same...although Pacquiao is my favourite as I prefer old school brawler's who come to fight and seek a knockout. However, in terms of technique, defence and the art of hitting without getting hit, few (if any) are better than Mayweather.
Same...although Pacquiao is my favourite as I prefer old school brawler's who come to fight and seek a knockout. However, in terms of technique, defence and the art of hitting without getting hit, few (if any) are better than Mayweather.
Yeah mayweather is exceptional in defense and I love how he slip all those punches ang throw his own in return But now I'm just amaze and disbelief that a 46 years old pacman can still compete to this level and still manage to draw(most people think pac won) to a young prime champion. Truly a legend stuff.
Yeah mayweather is exceptional in defense and I love how he slip all those punches ang throw his own in return But now I'm just amaze and disbelief that a 46 years old pacman can still compete to this level and still manage to draw(most people think pac won) to a young prime champion. Truly a legend stuff.
Tbh this is EXACTLY why I rate Pacquiao as the better fighter (although obviously I can appreciate if people believe Mayweather is better). I don't think Mayweather would DARE face a young champion in his prime at 46yo and let's not forget that Pacquiao already did this 6 years earlier and WON when he defeated a prime, undefeated Thurman aged 40. This plus the fact that he's an 8 division champion (vs. 5 for Floyd), 4 decade champion (vs. 3 for Floyd) and started his career in a much lower weight class (Junior Flyweight vs. Super Featherweight for Floyd) makes him the SUPERIOR fighter in my opinion.
Tbh this is EXACTLY why I rate Pacquiao is the better fighter (although obviously I can appreciate if people believe Mayweather is better). I don't think Mayweather would DARE face a young champion in his prime at 46yo and let's not forget that Pacquiao already did this 6 years earlier and WON when he defeated a prime, undefeated Thurman aged 40. This plus the fact that he's an 8 division champion (vs. 5 for Floyd) and 4 decade champion (vs. 3 for Floyd) and started his career in a much lower weight class (Junior Flyweight vs. Super Featherweight for Floyd) makes him the SUPERIOR fighter in my opinion.
You are absolutely correct even though I like floyd and I prefer to put him over pac but pac's achievement is so undeniable and seems impossible to achieved.
Comment