Comparing Usyk to Ali is laughable.

[famicommander]

I understand that. I still think that all three fights were close enough, maybe with a bit of bias, but not a complete robbery.

It was pure reputation. If the other guy was anyone else Norton has three solid UD wins. Ali got rounds he didn't earn because he was Ali.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

So then Peterson deserves full credit for his win over Khan? Taylor over Catterall? That's what the resume says.

Clown shoes. You can keep calling me pathetic all you want but you're engaging in the same exact behavior, except also demonstrating an extreme lack of reading comprehension and/or basic reasoning while you do it.

Again, you made this topic to make the case for Ali over Usyk. Then you mentioned clear robberies in support of that argument. That's really, really dumb.

Where did I say Ali deserves full credit? I was simply listing his resume you incoherent *****.

People will acknowledge official results over your irrelevant opinion. Period.

Peterson-Khan weren’t no robbery too, same as Ali-Norton 2, close fights. You’ll be talking about “the man in the hat” next.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

I understand that. I still think that all three fights were close enough, maybe with a bit of bias, but not a complete robbery.

2 certainly isn’t a robbery. Ali arguably could have won 1 too. I felt Norton got jobbed in fight 3, but it’s all opinion at the end of the day. Regardless of what we think the official result stands.