Originally posted by Oldskoolg
View Post
The '70s weren't objectively better. If you say: "yes" , it's only because of an emotional attachment to the era...even if you weren't born in it. It's easy to idealize the past or view it through rose-tinted lenses, in other words , through emotionally charged memories that blur reality. A favorite fighter, a childhood hero, or watching bouts with your old man… these aren’t just recollections, they’re emotional anchors.
But they don’t help us assess any era objectively, they trick us into believing it was better simply because we were happier, younger, or more impressionable.
But that doesn’t mean the era itself was superior. it means our relationship to it was. And that’s the trap.
Any kid, teenager, or adult living through today’s era—especially if they’re Ukrainian—will likely grow up viewing Oleksandr Usyk not just as a boxer, but as a national hero. To them, he’s the GOAT, the man who gave their people a semblance of hope amid a time of great struggle.
Carrying the weight of a nation on his shoulders, Usyk’s victories were more than just sporting achievements, know what i mean ?
There will never be another Ali, not because his talent and skills were unmatched or because he faced the greatest competition ever (that’s the myth we tell ourselves), but because of the unique combination of era, timing, and personality that shaped him.
Comment