Comments Thread For: Julio Cesar Chavez Jnr arrested, bound to be deported, says Department of Homeland Security

[CubanGuyNYC]

Didn’t vote for Trump but mate I am loving him getting these illegals out of the USA. Come here legally and obey our laws and don’t fly your flags here while being illegal and scared to be sent back to the country you have so much “pride” in

I didn’t either. I was always pretty neutral on Trump, but I’m quickly becoming a convert. The man is on an unprecedented roll. He follows through on what he promises. No threats, just results. That move against Iran? Epic. Facilitating peace in Congo and Rwanda, between Pakistan and India? When was the last time a US president did such a thing? The handling of Sleepy Joe’s colossal migrant mess? Gangster. Muscling through his One Big Beautiful Bill? Bruh… Making America great again isn’t just a catchy slogan with this guy — it’s looking like a guarantee.

[Lance98]

Get the f out of my country.

[Coverdale]

And they didn't know any of this until after his fight? Reminds me of when Floyd was allowed to fight JMM before going to jail. American laws can be bought and sold.

[TheIronMike]

He should be in a cartel video for losing to Jake Paul and disgracing the sport

[Elpatron2]

Get the f out of my country.

Exactly why they come here,when walmart ,costco try to buy up the whole pueblo puto
To much politics here/now on boxingscene,but like i said politicians got to politic, an box

[crisantonio917]

This is a moronic move by ICE and DHS, this guy will be back here soon and fighting here as well again....

[daggum]

Ahhh yes the old tried and true “colonizers” reasoning. Correction however, they were SETTLERS. Settlers build and improve. We are a nation of settlers first the. LEGAL CITIZENS. Which was done. Man has been dominating for centuries where the strong survive. This isn’t anything new. Next is the “Natives” argument. Who are the “Natives?” The tribes that were dominating each other? Which “tribe” was first? Do they own the planet? It’s also hilarious this argument always points to just the US from the hate America first crowd. The argument is tired, old, lazy and completely worn out. It’s run its course. Time to frame a new argument.

and who is the judge of what improvement is? Oh the people who took the land by force. That's very convenient. Literally no way to lose there. We did it for the good of everyone! This is also what white supremacy is based on and espouses...

Might makes right is literally the definition of colonization, yet you just said they weren't colonizers?

political refugees from Venezuela? Don't want them. America first. Climate refugees from Haiti? Don't want them. America first. fellow colonizers i mean settlers from south Africa? Welcome to America

[daggum]

I didn’t either. I was always pretty neutral on Trump, but I’m quickly becoming a convert. The man is on an unprecedented roll. He follows through on what he promises. No threats, just results. That move against Iran? Epic. Facilitating peace in Congo and Rwanda, between Pakistan and India? When was the last time a US president did such a thing? The handling of Sleepy Joe’s colossal migrant mess? Gangster. Muscling through his One Big Beautiful Bill? Bruh… Making America great again isn’t just a catchy slogan with this guy — it’s looking like a guarantee.

He literally promised the opposite though. He also promised not to cut health care... woops! Some things he lies about and some things he follows through on. Now which are which and why?

Republ-icans will always go to war, always cut government services, always attack the labor force, always fund police state/ defense, always protect and enrich the rich with tax cuts, contracts, and deregulation. Nothing has changed at all from that. Trump is not differenr at all just super charged.

Repubs were taking smaller steps toward a fas-cist oligarchy or setting the foundations for one, and trump took one giant step towards it but he had the conditions to do it so who should get the credit or blame? Suppose both

The American people get nothing while their country is plundered, well they get a war on non American and un-american people which as we can see are quickly becoming all emcompasing terms. the Repu-blicans were able to trick people into thinking the countries problems were because of "the others" "immigrants" etc...

so now they have people completely looking in the wrong direction to why things only get worse. They can continue this fake war against the others for a long time, especially with their deep roots in media and social media. Dark times

[Boxingfanatic75]

He literally promised the opposite though. He also promised not to cut health care... woops! Some things he lies about and some things he follows through on. Now which are which and why?

Republ-icans will always go to war, always cut government services, always attack the labor force, always fund police state/ defense, always protect and enrich the rich with tax cuts, contracts, and deregulation. Nothing has changed at all from that. Trump is not differenr at all just super charged.

Repubs were taking smaller steps toward a fas-cist oligarchy or setting the foundations for one, and trump took one giant step towards it but he had the conditions to do it so who should get the credit or blame? Suppose both

The American people get nothing while their country is plundered, well they get a war on non American and un-american people which as we can see are quickly becoming all emcompasing terms. the Repu-blicans were able to trick people into thinking the countries problems were because of "the others" "immigrants" etc...

so now they have people completely looking in the wrong direction to why things only get worse. They can continue this fake war against the others for a long time, especially with their deep roots in media and social media. Dark times

He didn’t “cut health care.” He cut the freeloaders, the able bodied people who won’t get out of bed to go to work who are on Medicaid. He is mandating those welfare collecting slugs to work 20 hours a week instead of continuous freebies on my dime. This “enrich the rich” argument is also old and tired when you’re smart enough to look at who pays in society. Ever seen a poor man meet a payroll for 50 others? No? Because it doesn’t happen.

Bet you didn’t know that over half in the country pay no federal income taxes. The top 1% pay 40% of ALL federal income taxes. But hey FAIR SHARE right? The top 10% pay 72% of ALL Federal income taxes. The top 50% pay 97% of ALL Federal income taxes. So, now knowing this, how much should a millionaire pay out of their check? How much should they be robbed? 80% of their pay?

[CubanGuyNYC]

He didn’t “cut health care.” He cut the freeloaders, the able bodied people who won’t get out of bed to go to work who are on Medicaid. He is mandating those welfare collecting slugs to work 20 hours a week instead of continuous freebies on my dime. This “enrich the rich” argument is also old and tired when you’re smart enough to look at who pays in society. Ever seen a poor man meet a payroll for 50 others? No? Because it doesn’t happen.

Bet you didn’t know that over half in the country pay no federal income taxes. The top 1% pay 40% of ALL federal income taxes. But hey FAIR SHARE right? The top 10% pay 72% of ALL Federal income taxes. The top 50% pay 97% of ALL Federal income taxes. So, now knowing this, how much should a millionaire pay out of their check? How much should they be robbed? 80% of their pay?

Thank you. The vast majority of people will listen to politically likeminded demagogues without doing the research themselves. I started my own independent research after the bill was passed by the House yesterday, because I had my concerns, and came to the highlighted impression. And as for the rich, your statements are on point. At least half the people on earth (probably a lot more) rely on those capable enough to produce multi-billion-dollar fortunes for the life they live now. It’s those very people that demand the rich pay ever more. Some guy provides a handheld cordless phone that allows billions of people to communicate all over the world on what’s basically a handheld computer; some other guy provides electric cars for the masses, and the “little guy” demands that they pay their “fair share.” These are the people that Ayn Rand called “takers.” They produce nothing themselves; they are incapable of running a company that employs any number of people like themselves; they can only attempt to pull down those more capable than themselves by government instituted theft.