Why are people saying Dirrell hurt Froch?

[THE REED]

Froch was absolutely wobbled by a counter shot by Dirrel at the end of the round.

[Kevin Jesus]

Froch wasn't hurt atall. Had they engaged Dirrell would have had his ass whooped.

That's funny you say that, because when they did engaged Froch would get countered to death and even backed off on two different occasions.

[jazluvr]

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of **** again?

Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement.

1. No, maybe just you.
2. Froch was staggering like a drunk after an assault by Dirrell in the 10th. Only his opinion he could have gone longer. I bet Dirrell would have won if it went longer. Bias ref.

[P.WILL]

[Dorian]

[Dorian]

you be the judge.

[Madvillain]

see that's what I thought. I think the US commentators are dying to look for weakness in UK fighters and fk with US fans heads.

Or maybe UK Commentators are biased towards their boy and didn't want to say anything about it.

WAIT THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE, THERE'S NO WAY UK FIGHT FANS ARE BIASED IN ANY WAY!

[Shadows]

Froch got hit with three counter shots, was wobbled, then back pedaled to the ropes and covered up.

[street bully]

Froch was on ***** street twice, Direll was never that hurt.

[mr.thraz]

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of **** again?

Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement.

cause he did.

just cause froch recovered doesn't mean he wasn't hurt.


nobody said froch was a sloch in the chin department.

he was hurt but recuperated well.