Why are people saying Dirrell hurt Froch?

[NakiFan]

only one fighter was bleeding and had bruises last night.

Froch had a face as smooth as a babys bottom!

[Steve Harvey]

only one fighter was bleeding and had bruises last night.

Froch had a face as smooth as a babys bottom!

I guess you know someone can get hit and hurt but still not bleed?

[Weebler I]

Dirrell wobbled Froch... its academic.

so why didn't he finish him?

[Leo Mayweather]

Im sure I seen Froch do the chicken dance in the 10th

[djtmal]

if dirrell had a little more experience froch would have been put on his back...

[Pullcounter]

so why didn't he finish him?

duh.. froch has a decent chin.

[Steve Harvey]

so why didn't he finish him?

It was closer to the end of the round.

[The Future]

so why didn't he finish him?

yeah he wobbled Froch in the tenth round but froch recovered quickly...and it was near the end of the round. Your blind if you did not see his legs do a little dance

[713832281]

cuz he hit him and his legs buckled??

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of **** again?

Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement.

[#1Assassin]

lol at this biased ****** TS.

u can think froch won if u want to. but saying he wasnt hurt is just plain ignorance. he was hit clean and wobbled quite a bit. had his back against the ropes and dirrell was going of throwing punches in bunches.

someone said it already but ill repeat. if u didnt see him get hurt you are eighter blind or extremly biased.