This has to be said!.......

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HandSpeed303
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 4793
    • 125
    • 97
    • 22,213

    #1

    This has to be said!.......

    I for one can't see how anyone can support a Froch win. Now the truth of the matter is Dirrell did run alot, but he also hurt Frouch (twice), he landed pretty much all the counters, and all the leads.

    How on earth can you say Froch won when it is clear that he lost?

    Now don't get me wrong, I give AA and CF credit for the wins(I said AA would beat JT), but anyone going on about Froch winning needs to stop it.

    Yes he got the "W", but didn't land more than two good punches, and was getting counterd all night long.

    No hate here, just facts.
  • Crazylegs77
    null and void
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 13101
    • 445
    • 296
    • 21,573

    #2
    its over, its boxing, Dirrell will carry on and be KOd so no need to worry about he scorecards next time.

    Comment

    • HandSpeed303
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 4793
      • 125
      • 97
      • 22,213

      #3
      Originally posted by Crazylegs077
      its over, its boxing, Dirrell will carry on and be KOd so no need to worry about he scorecards next time.
      ........................Ok

      Comment

      • ИATAS
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 36648
        • 2,509
        • 1,953
        • 50,835

        #4
        the only thing froch supports will say is "dirrell ran" blah blah blah. He simply out-boxed him, like it or not; there is no way froch won that fight.

        Comment

        • Madvillain
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 1080
          • 47
          • 18
          • 7,471

          #5
          I agree, Dirrell completely outclassed him, it wasn't a pretty fight, and Andre did A LOT of holding, but he made Froch miss every puch and landed practically every shot he threw at will.

          The fans who are making the "DIRRELL RAN LIEK A BTCH" threads are just upset that he made Froch look every bit as mediocre as he is.
          Last edited by Madvillain; 10-18-2009, 04:57 PM.

          Comment

          • Syf
            KO Artist
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 7574
            • 291
            • 191
            • 14,978

            #6
            Originally posted by HandSpeed303
            I for one can't see how anyone can support a Froch win. Now the truth of the matter is Dirrell did run alot, but he also hurt Frouch (twice), he landed pretty much all the counters, and all the leads.

            How on earth can you say Froch won when it is clear that he lost?

            Now don't get me wrong, I give AA and CF credit for the wins(I said AA would beat JT), but anyone going on about Froch winning needs to stop it.

            Yes he got the "W", but didn't land more than two good punches, and was getting counterd all night long.

            No hate here, just facts.
            Because people get caught up in concepts of nationalism..and pride...and blind machismo..

            Any objective viewers...that don't have some sort of vested interest in either fighter..will decide overwhelmingly for the challenger.

            But eh.

            Comment

            • REMOVED SHARK 97
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 3909
              • 134
              • 124
              • 5,753

              #7
              Froch came forward and 80% of the fight Dirrell was back peddling because he was intimidated by Froch, he didn't land that many effective shots as people claim.

              Froch was controlling the fight, Dirrell was just shooting fast jabs combined with clinching, whining, turning around, ducking down ect...

              With all that you could tell the judges had a boxing fan mentality... such as...

              Hey this guy is here to fight and this dude is just prancing about clinching every 5 second, you can score due to activity, ring genralship ect.. and thats what won Froch the rounds on.

              Dirrell did a good job nullifing Froch's attacks, but turned it into a dirty fight by doing so.

              Comment

              • S A M U R A I
                Bulletproof
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 181694
                • 1,495
                • 1,324
                • 1,419,318

                #8
                You're asking how can anyone think Froch won? That's simple -- it was a close fight. However, on a second viewing I had Dirrell ahead by a point or so. Froch looked like ****. Let's be honest. His MMA tactics were pretty embarrassing as were his constant fouls. Dirrell did get on his bike too much (he fought scared... again, let's be honest), but he out-landed Froch by a silly amount and landed crisp, clean, accurate blows all night.

                I can understand why Dirrell didn't get the decision. Yes, he won the fight, I agree with this, but does he deserve to be a world champion based on the performance he gave us? It's debatable. I think he needs more work. On the other hand, so does Froch. What the hell... I'm past caring anymore, because neither of them are all that great.



                100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                Comment

                • The_Demon
                  Big dog
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 13604
                  • 1,354
                  • 888
                  • 22,971

                  #9
                  froch is so bad its not even funny
                  dirrell clearly won the fight,just didnt get the decision,simple as that

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #10
                    Originally posted by HandSpeed303
                    I for one can't see how anyone can support a Froch win. Now the truth of the matter is Dirrell did run alot, but he also hurt Frouch (twice), he landed pretty much all the counters, and all the leads.

                    How on earth can you say Froch won when it is clear that he lost?

                    Now don't get me wrong, I give AA and CF credit for the wins(I said AA would beat JT), but anyone going on about Froch winning needs to stop it.

                    Yes he got the "W", but didn't land more than two good punches, and was getting counterd all night long.

                    No hate here, just facts.
                    a green prospect made froch look like an amatuer... dirrell deserved the win, but froch looks like a dunce for not beating a green prospect down.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP