Education for the idiots... RUNNING IS NOT BOXING

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joartcc5
    Banned
    • Sep 2009
    • 1174
    • 79
    • 27
    • 1,487

    #1

    Education for the idiots... RUNNING IS NOT BOXING

    I've seen way too many kiddo idiots here who doesn't know the difference between running and boxing.

    For the start of ur education...

    THE MOMENT U DISENGAGE... U RUN...

    THE MOMENT U RUN... UR NOT BOXING.

    Movement in boxing is simply using angles without disengaging.

    Any other definition apart from that is running.
  • jonesy
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 1581
    • 105
    • 91
    • 1,948

    #2
    Originally posted by joartcc5
    i've seen way too many kiddo idiots here who doesn't know the difference between running and boxing.

    For the start of ur education...

    The moment u disengage... U run...

    The moment u run... Ur not boxing.

    Movement in boxing is simply using angles without disengaging.

    Any other definition apart from that is running.
    i agree

    the yanks find this hard to comprehend

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #3
      Not landing doesn't win fights.

      Comment

      • ..WaRSpencE..
        .::Orgullo Mexicano::.
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 6316
        • 310
        • 132
        • 13,727

        #4
        Originally posted by joartcc5
        I've seen way too many kiddo idiots here who doesn't know the difference between running and boxing.

        For the start of ur education...

        THE MOMENT U DISENGAGE... U RUN...

        THE MOMENT U RUN... UR NOT BOXING.

        Movement in boxing is simply using angles without disengaging.

        Any other definition apart from that is running.
        So than why not put them in a 10' x 10' ring and let them beat the **** out of each other?..

        Boxing is to move and use your space, and your intelligence with the space given..brawling like an idiot swinging wildly..is definitely not Boxing..

        those who believe that movement isn't boxing should consider MMA as their sport to watch..

        Comment

        • Akyra
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 11643
          • 357
          • 207
          • 12,259

          #5
          i'm puerto rican and i completely agree. why get into boxing if all you're going to do is run?

          we watch boxing because we want to see two athletes go at it and fight. that's an essential part of boxing, if you're not willing to fight then gtfo. glad to see they're still preserving, respecting and honoring the very basics and culture of boxing.

          Comment

          • REMOVED SHARK 97
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 3909
            • 134
            • 124
            • 5,753

            #6
            Originally posted by .::EyEKoNiK::.
            So than why not put them in a 10' x 10' ring and let them beat the **** out of each other?..

            Boxing is to move and use your space, and your intelligence with the space given..brawling like an idiot swinging wildly..is definitely not Boxing..

            those who believe that movement isn't boxing should consider MMA as their sport to watch..
            Because they fight in a matchbox sized ring?

            Comment

            • joartcc5
              Banned
              • Sep 2009
              • 1174
              • 79
              • 27
              • 1,487

              #7
              Originally posted by jonesy
              i agree

              the yanks find this hard to comprehend
              Mostly the idiot kids here and some uneducated morons who have went to boxing for about a month or so.

              I mean it's the yanks who invented that adage that is why the greatest of their boxers weren't runners.

              Ali, Robinson, Armstrong.

              These kids seem to have forgotten the fine traditions and examples set by their past champions...

              That in their desperation, they will resort to stealing victories instead of taking it.

              Comment

              • joartcc5
                Banned
                • Sep 2009
                • 1174
                • 79
                • 27
                • 1,487

                #8
                Originally posted by .::EyEKoNiK::.
                So than why not put them in a 10' x 10' ring and let them beat the **** out of each other?..

                Boxing is to move and use your space, and your intelligence with the space given..brawling like an idiot swinging wildly..is definitely not Boxing..

                those who believe that movement isn't boxing should consider MMA as their sport to watch..
                U can use movement... Learn to read.

                I did not say u cannot use movement, in fact u shud. Learn to fckin read kid.

                But the moment u disengage.. u run.

                It's a simple 1 sentence construction and u people still cant understand... wtf!

                Comment

                • MidnightSpecial
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 11412
                  • 596
                  • 269
                  • 23,646

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jonesy
                  i agree

                  the yanks find this hard to comprehend
                  yeah and walking in with no head movement and always swinging for the fences is the best way to win.
                  Oh wait Hatton can tell you that doesnt work.

                  Get over it Froch looked like some bum that they picked up off the street with the way he was throwing punches. Just because he wasnt skilled enough to hit someone on the move and cut off the ring you have to get mad and make excuses that Dirrell ran. A fighter with more skill would have taken that fight from Dirrell easily. Froch is a bum and will not win another match here on out.

                  Comment

                  • joartcc5
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 1174
                    • 79
                    • 27
                    • 1,487

                    #10
                    Originally posted by USA_Pugilist
                    yeah and walking in with no head movement and always swinging for the fences is the best way to win.
                    Oh wait Hatton can tell you that doesnt work.

                    Get over it Froch looked like some bum that they picked up off the street with the way he was throwing punches. Just because he wasnt skilled enough to hit someone on the move and cut off the ring you have to get mad and make excuses that Dirrell ran. A fighter with more skill would have taken that fight from Dirrell easily. Froch is a bum and will not win another match here on out.
                    The point of hte thread is about running.

                    Again... the moment u disengage u freakin run.

                    Understand?

                    There are way too many idiots here who do not understand boxing.

                    Dont add urself to them.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP