If Hopkins was 3 years younger and could easily make 168, I'd have picked him to win this entire thing.
A 45 year old man is our last line of defense.
Collapse
-
-
-
If he JUST fights the winner, yeah I'd pick him to win, most likely.
By then, however, he might be 47-48 years old. This is a 2-3 year tourney.Comment
-
160 would be a serious killer for him. He would go back to having the stamina issues he had against Taylor. 168 wouldn't be a problem for B-Hop, I know that much.Comment
-
Comment
-
You should be ashamed in thinking that a 45 year LHW who spent most of his career as a MW could actually cherry pick a SMW.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Why is everybody underrating Kessler? Even underrating AA I don't get it. Kessler is 10x times the fighter at 170 than what Pavlik was. Kessler is 10x the fighter at 170 than what Winky was. Kessler might not be as good as Calzaghe at 175. But, B-Hop is a couple years older now. So we don't know what might happen.
I am not saying Hopkins will not win. But, I doubt it would be as easy. I think Kessler and AA would give B-Hop a good fight. And, the end one fighter will win a very close decision that everybody would complain about.Comment
-
Hopkins? Joe's been there and worn the t-shirt...knockdown or not. No European would get credit for beating Hopkins...all we would hear is "Hopkins was shot...blah blah"Comment
Comment