Thurman has very underrated resume

[IronDanHamza]

It wasn't the truth though if he couldn't land a punch on the other guy

How does that change the fact he was #1 when that fight took place?

Hagler couldn’t land a punch on a shop worn Sugar Ray Leonard when he got schooled but that doesn’t change the fact he was #1 before that schooling.

[djtmal]

How does that change the fact he was #1 when that fight took place?

.

Obviously your source was lying

[djtmal]

Hagler couldn’t land a punch on a shop worn Sugar Ray Leonard when he got schooled but that doesn’t change the fact he was #1 before that schooling.

Wtf are you talking about. Hagler lost on a split decision that means not only did he land punches he won rounds, and if anyone was shopworn it was Hagler 2 to 4 yrs older than Srl with 60+ fights the last 2 all out wars. Srl shelved himself for years waiting Hagler out.

[IronDanHamza]

Wtf are you talking about. Hagler lost on a split decision that means not only did he land punches he won rounds, and if anyone was shopworn it was Hagler 2 to 4 yrs older than Srl with 60+ fights the last 2 all out wars. Srl shelved himself for years waiting Hagler out.

Ohhhhhhh lookey here now you want to bring scorecards and decisions into your argument Now you want to use facts when it suits you. Surprise surprise. who’da thunk it?

Whats your source? boxrec? I thought you said official scorecards don’t matter? Now they do, weird.

You see this is the problem when you want to make up reality as you go along when it suits you. It can be turned on its head at any time.

Hagler was totally schooled in his prime by a shopworn Leonard. Hagler didn’t land a punch. So what if the judges scored rounds for Hagler? They were obviously wrong, just like you’re saying the rankings are wrong. (When it suits you of course)

Ya see the problem you’ve got yourself into here, dumbass?

[djtmal]

Ohhhhhhh lookey here now you want to bring scorecards and decisions into your argument Now you want to use facts when it suits you. Surprise surprise. who’da thunk it?

Whats your source? boxrec? I thought you said official scorecards don’t matter? Now they do, weird.

You see this is the problem when you want to make up reality as you go along when it suits you. It can be turned on its head at any time.

Hagler was totally schooled in his prime by a shopworn Leonard. Hagler didn’t land a punch. So what if the judges scored rounds for Hagler? They were obviously wrong, just like you’re saying the rankings are wrong. (When it suits you of course)

Ya see the problem you’ve got yourself into here, dumbass?

Lol. Start a Hagler/Srl thread

[IronDanHamza]

Lol. Start a Hagler/Srl thread

Yeah exactly you little bitch

[djtmal]

Yeah exactly you little bitch

Start a Srl/Hagler thread and see how far you go with that rhetoric

[djtmal]

Hagler was totally schooled in his prime by a shopworn Leonard. Hagler didn’t land a punch. ?

Is that what boxrec told you

[STREET CLEANER]

Inactivity kept him off the top list plus he got lost in his woman's veejay when he got married.

[IronDanHamza]

Is that what boxrec told you

No it’s what happened. You can make up reality and deny facts when it suits you. These are the issues that arise.