Canelo and Usyk have something in common

[daggum]

I would say they are exact opposites. Usyk deserves all his accolades. Canelo not so much.

There is no fight that Usyk deserved to lose. None. Closest was breidis but he won without a doubt. The Fury fights were really not that close 8-4 at worst. The chisora fight was not very close either. Canelo lost to ggg 1 and 2 was dubious. Lara dubious.

Not to mention the shameless ducking. Usyk is not ducking anyone that's silly. Parker and kabayel aren't even number 1 in the Division yet. Usyk fought Joshua in England, breidis in Latvia, huck in Germany, glowacki in Poland, gassiev in Russia.

[Boxing 112]

I think it's so obvious that it doesnt meed to be explained.

You know they fought already.
You know the result.
You know how DDD, as a loser, got this belt.
so why does he deserve a rematch just cuz he has a stolen belt from a guy who already beat him?

No point going back and forth with haters like you who just ignored the reason he does deserve it

[billeau2]

Many close fights that went in their favor.

Because Canelo has 2 legit losses and another 2-3 unofficial losses, he can`t be unbeaten face of boxing or whatever sensitive western world needs, so we got Usyk.

Another thing is they are giving us fights nobody wants to see like, Canelo fighting Scull or Usyk rematching Dubois.

Usyk is happy du.cking Kabayel and Parker just like Canelo was happy ducking Benavidez.

You appear most times to be a very enlightened poster yet here you are talking about USYK ducking Parker. One could at the very least make a hypothetical case that maybe k a b a y e l scares USYK because he got hit with that body shot from DuBois. I don't think this is true by any stretch but it would have some coherence based on motivation. How in heaven's name would anybody think Parker would be ducked by USYK?

[BustedKnuckles]

No point going back and forth with haters like you who just ignored the reason he does deserve it

Haters... Sure buddy. Do you think childish name calling proves your point? It only shows readers you're a weak-minded individual who resorts to personal attacks rather than debating facts.

[Boxing 112]

Haters... Sure buddy. Do you think childish name calling proves your point? It only shows readers you're a weak-minded individual who resorts to personal attacks rather than debating facts.

The facts are all there. I have not seen any real argument except the fact you all just use that he lost to Usyk before

[El_Mero]

Both are caucasian