Bias commentary, bull****t official clearly this is the ROBBERY OF ALL Time!!
Emanuel Navarrete vs Charly Suarez - ESPN+
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Listen to douchebag Kriegal saying, "Where's the blood"? He's still in denial. Sounds like all the commentators except Bradley were wishing and hoping that it was a headbutt. They were totally biased in favour of Navarratte. Looks like Kriegal and Bernardo were sucking on Nav's nads.Last edited by Damn Wicked; 05-10-2025, 11:40 PM.Comment
-
Navarette quit and it was clearly from a punch.
he aint a warrior. He aint pacquiaoAttached FilesComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
seems more like justification for lack of accountablity from the commissions. we get lots of rematches lately that nobody asks forOriginally posted by Teetotaler23
To alot of these moron fans they are. Been like that since boxing startedComment
-
There was a lot of blood but we've seen many fights that weren't stopped with a cut that was on the forehead and bleeding badly. Tim Zsyu against Fundora was way worse. Navarratte's team just didn't think that their fighter would win, so they chose to stop the fight early. It took the judges a very long time to tally up 8 rounds of scorecards...That should also be raising eyebrows.Originally posted by Teetotaler23Missed the fight. Was the cut even that bad for it to end or was Navarretes team wanting it to stop?Comment
Comment