Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: The Rewatch, 10 years later: Was Mayweather-Pacquiao really that bad?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Floyd showed his class. There are levels to this, and he was always at a higher level than Pacquiao.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
      Floyd showed his class. There are levels to this, and he was always at a higher level than Pacquiao.
      8 divisions vs 5 divisions. Plus floyd was bigger.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BOJACK View Post

        8 divisions vs 5 divisions. Plus floyd was bigger.
        Floyd was also older. And simply better.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
          Floyd showed his class. There are levels to this, and he was always at a higher level than Pacquiao.
          IMO there is no higher level than Pacquiao and Mayweather. They were in the same class of brilliance. Their matchup and the way it goes depends a lot on which versions you pick. Most agree it happened 5-6 years too late.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

            Floyd was also older. And simply better.
            Chronological Age dont mean jack $h!t in boxing.

            Wear and tear is a better indicator of age.

            Pacquiao just had more fights and more wars.

            Just look at Wildred Benitez, washed at age 25, that's after fighting 3 hall of famers before 25.

            Pacquiao has nearly double the fights against hall of famers than floyd when they fought.
            Last edited by RuleOfTheSpear; Yesterday, 05:44 AM.
            Haka Haka PryorHawk ijudge like this.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by BKM- View Post

              IMO there is no higher level than Pacquiao and Mayweather. They were in the same class of brilliance. Their matchup and the way it goes depends a lot on which versions you pick. Most agree it happened 5-6 years too late.
              Floyd showed he was at a higher level than Pacquiao.

              The fight could have happened in 2009 but Pacquiao ran away just because of a little drug testing. Then years later he too was asking people to do stricter drug testing.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by RuleOfTheSpear View Post

                Age dont mean jack $h!t in boxing.

                Wear and tear is a better indicator of age.

                Pacquiao just had more fights and more wars.

                Just look at Wildred Benitez, washed at age 25, that's after fighting 3 hall of famers before 25.

                Pacquiao has nearly double the fights against hall of famers than floyd when they fought.
                Age makes you slower right?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  Floyd showed he was at a higher level than Pacquiao.

                  The fight could have happened in 2009 but Pacquiao ran away just because of a little drug testing. Then years later he too was asking people to do stricter drug testing.
                  Ok I guess I expected higher of you.

                  Unfortunately you fall into the black-white spectrums of "Pac sux and was scared of Floyd who wuz better" and "Floyd sux and was scared of Pac who wuz better".

                  Inbetween those, there is a very small percentage of free thinkers who have a nuanced view on this situation and those are the only ones I interact with in this section.
                  Coverdale Coverdale likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by BKM- View Post

                    Ok I guess I expected higher of you.

                    Unfortunately you fall into the black-white spectrums of "Pac sux and was scared of Floyd who wuz better" and "Floyd sux and was scared of Pac who wuz better".

                    Inbetween those, there is a very small percentage of free thinkers who have a nuanced view on this situation and those are the only ones I interact with in this section.
                    It is what it is, Floyd showed he was at a higher level than Pacquiao by beating him.

                    I wish the fight had happened when they were both closer to their primes but the only person to blame for that is Pac (and/or his promoter Bob Arum.)

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                      It is what it is, Floyd showed he was at a higher level than Pacquiao by beating him.

                      I wish the fight had happened when they were both closer to their primes but the only person to blame for that is Pac (and/or his promoter Bob Arum.)
                      I think I mistook your level because there are quite a few posters on here with jack Dempsey avatars and they happen to be quality posters. This was my mistake and I will accept it. Carry on bud.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP