USA Today - Froch vs. Dirrell: 117-110

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joartcc5
    Banned
    • Sep 2009
    • 1174
    • 79
    • 27
    • 1,487

    #41
    Dirrell wont win a fight by running at the elite level.

    These Americans need to realize running won't work against elites.

    They need to have balls and start fighting.

    Comment

    • The_Visitation
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 1570
      • 49
      • 24
      • 7,791

      #42
      Sorry. It was a close fight that could have gone either way, but 117-110 is fantasy scoring. Certainly Dirrell's corner disagreed, else why;

      "Dirrell's trainer tells him he needs a KO to win since he's in Froch's hometown"
      if clearly they didn't agree it was close? You can hardly claim Dirrell was never going to get a decision as his whole gameplan was based around getting one!!

      He lost a close one. Get over it, and your own bias. Those who called it for Froch (I actually scored it a draw) are no less 'true boxing fans' than the whining YUU-ESS-AYYY contigent.

      Now on to Kessler v. Ward.

      Comment

      • Roger Mellie
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 5969
        • 367
        • 385
        • 6,591

        #43
        117-110 is lunacy. I had Dirrell up by 1,but 117-110 is bollocks.

        Comment

        • DC Fight Fan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 1852
          • 61
          • 40
          • 8,111

          #44
          Originally posted by The_Visitation
          Sorry. It was a close fight that could have gone either way, but 117-110 is fantasy scoring. Certainly Dirrell's corner disagreed, else why;



          if clearly they didn't agree it was close? You can hardly claim Dirrell was never going to get a decision as his whole gameplan was based around getting one!!

          He lost a close one. Get over it, and your own bias. Those who called it for Froch (I actually scored it a draw) are no less 'true boxing fans' than the whining YUU-ESS-AYYY contigent.

          Now on to Kessler v. Ward.
          I am pretty sure his Grandfather told him he needed a KO because regardless of how it should have been scored he felt Dirrell would have a tough time winning a decision in Froch's backyard.

          Comment

          • The_Demon
            Big dog
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 13604
            • 1,354
            • 888
            • 22,971

            #45
            it was a bad decision i feel bad for dirrell,coming over too england and getting robbed like that.
            poor reffing and shabby,biased commentary on primetime
            i realized how bad froch actually is last night
            half-decent power/chin but fights in slow motion and was hitting air for 12 rounds,looked terrible in there.

            Comment

            • Shadows
              All-Time Great
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 8293
              • 192
              • 250
              • 15,434

              #46
              Originally posted by DC Fight Fan
              I am pretty sure his Grandfather told him he needed a KO because regardless of how it should have been scored he felt Dirrell would have a tough time winning a decision in Froch's backyard.
              I thought he said the same.

              117-110 is too wide.

              Comment

              • S.G.
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 9412
                • 296
                • 635
                • 16,360

                #47
                I gave Froch three rounds.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP