dirrell lost withhout any debate...

**BEEHOP** · 10-18-2009, 05:09 AM

Who's that guy in your avatar?

**The Dice** · 10-18-2009, 05:10 AM

What is boxing all about. Hitting someone and not getting hit. Dirrell landed more and got hit less. He clearly won the fight. Super Six has lost all cred

**Matt Marvelous** · 10-18-2009, 05:11 AM

Froch fans need to stop trolling for attention...

Your man is gonna get crushed by Kessler in due time son. Enjoy your moment while it lasts.

**Sam D. Menace** · 10-18-2009, 05:11 AM

i';d like to see anyone that did'nt bet on carl winnin makin a thread sayin carl won

**CiganoBoxer** · 10-18-2009, 05:12 AM

Another thread..my same response ...i am from the UK and i didnt want Dirrel to win but i thought Dirrel won that fight....but then he was very negative at times....and if your gonna win a world title you've got to win it big....he was trying to steal it at times...he said he didn't know why the ref took a point but he was like a sailor holding on to a mast at times....you cant win a title like in the eyes of judges!
That being said IMO Dirrel won that fight

**BoxingChaos** · 10-18-2009, 05:12 AM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

Seriously you yanks need to accept that you have lost the first to fights...

I was actually there, granted you can argue im a biased viewer, but those at ring side all agree wityh my verdict...

How the fcuk can you even give a split to dirrell???Firstlky hes obviously very skillful but ffs he has to come to nottingham and take the belt by both hands...there were very large perioopds where he didnt throw a punch...

Froch kept popping him with the jab all night hence why at the end froch had no scratches and dirrels nose was bleeding and eyes were swollen...

I think dirrell is world class but no way did he win that fight, and this fight shows that froch can be patient and adapt to any fighter...

I think dirrell is a nightmare for anyone since he ran all night and made no effort to have a boxing match..

I agree. Not a lump or a scratch.

Does that look like the face of a man who got beat up or was in a fight?

No because his opponent ran all night.

Proof is in the pudding.

**mr.thraz** · 10-18-2009, 05:12 AM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

Seriously you yanks need to accept that you have lost the first to fights...

I was actually there, granted you can argue im a biased viewer, but those at ring side all agree wityh my verdict...

How the fcuk can you even give a split to dirrell???Firstlky hes obviously very skillful but ffs he has to come to nottingham and take the belt by both hands...there were very large perioopds where he didnt throw a punch...

Froch kept popping him with the jab all night hence why at the end froch had no scratches and dirrels nose was bleeding and eyes were swollen...

I think dirrell is world class but no way did he win that fight, and this fight shows that froch can be patient and adapt to any fighter...

I think dirrell is a nightmare for anyone since he ran all night and made no effort to have a boxing match..

your a nitwit.

they both fought like trash tonight but dirrell was killing croch with counters and movement.

thats it period.

the whole tournament is tainted now.

**Sam D. Menace** · 10-18-2009, 05:13 AM

Originally posted by BoxingChaos

I agree. Not a lump or a scratch.

Does that look like the face of a man who got beat up or was in a fight?

No because his opponent ran all night.

Proof is in the pudding.

damn, what's wrong his nose? dirrell ****ed that guy up

**hugh grant** · 10-18-2009, 05:15 AM

didnt see the fight. but when you talked like dirrell did before the fight, i dont think dirrell deserves anything for that performance. If that performance was anything like ive heard it was.

Talking the talk, but no walk.

dirrell lost withhout any debate...